2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital to facilitate ‘engineered’ university–industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relational embeddedness refers to ‘the high‐quality, cohesive social interaction between the members of the network as a community of organizations, which could enable the firm’s embeddedness in a network of relations to generate beneficial advantages through multiple members’ interaction at and across levels’ (Lin et al, , p. 765). Social network theory suggests that relational embeddedness allows firms to maintain sustainable and trustworthy relationships with their partners, which, is the basis for improving technological capabilities to conduct innovation activities (Al‐Tabbaa and Ankrah, ).…”
Section: Theories and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relational embeddedness refers to ‘the high‐quality, cohesive social interaction between the members of the network as a community of organizations, which could enable the firm’s embeddedness in a network of relations to generate beneficial advantages through multiple members’ interaction at and across levels’ (Lin et al, , p. 765). Social network theory suggests that relational embeddedness allows firms to maintain sustainable and trustworthy relationships with their partners, which, is the basis for improving technological capabilities to conduct innovation activities (Al‐Tabbaa and Ankrah, ).…”
Section: Theories and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the cognitive dimension is related to sharing codes and narratives and a common understanding of organizational goals (Al‐Tabbaa & Ankrah, ), communicative processes, as well as the nature of transferred knowledge, can be considered a relevant way of characterizing this dimension.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the cognitive dimension is related to sharing codes and narratives and a common understanding of organizational goals(Al-Tabbaa & Ankrah, 2016), communicative processes, as well as the nature of transferred knowledge, can be considered a relevant way of characterizing this dimension.Knowledge is not propagated in a vacuum, but within a "contextu-alized space," known as ba. It can be classified as formal ba, referring to the opportunity formally provided by the organization such as scheduled meetings and institutionalized forums for interactions with others; informal ba, related to opportunities for casual communication and not defined by the organization or work process; and cyber ba, corresponding to interactions via electronic media (Magnier-Watanabe et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the economic analogy of capital, social capital is conceptualized as a resource that can be accumulated or drawn upon in times of need. Unlike traditional tangible resources (e.g., financial or human capital), social capital is distinctive in that it exists in the structure of relationships between actors, and is, therefore, jointly owned [28]. Social capital, unlike other capital resources, is not physically tradable, but is an emergent phenomenon from the interaction of social practices and shared norms and values.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%