Social capital, serious mental illness, and the intersection of disaster: Recommendations for enabling resilience

Ressler, Jacob

doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103390

Cited by 4 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The coordination of efforts and resource allocation were shown to be crucially dependent on local government officials, with several studies reporting effective resilience-building projects spearheaded by local governments. Several studies demonstrated how well non-governmental organizations collaborated with local stakeholders, making them important partners in providing technical know-how and assistance [22,58,62]. To ensure that the suggested resilience solutions were both culturally acceptable and sensitive to community needs, community members were crucial in guiding the process and providing their local expertise.…”

Section: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As it develops a feeling of collective responsibility and mutual support among community members, stronger community cohesiveness may result in better preparation, response, and recovery in the face of natural disasters and public health concerns. Inter-organizational networks are crucial for fostering community resilience because they enable cooperation and resource sharing across several groups, such as governmental bodies, non-governmental organizations, and businesses [22]. Civic engagement is an essential component of social capital that may support community resilience [3].…”

Section: Components Of "One Community At a Time" Social Capital And N...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Reciprocity ensures neighbors are motivated to help one another, while trust allows people to depend on others in need. Resilience must be developed and maintained via effective community leadership [22]. Strong leaders may aid during crises by mobilizing resources, coordinating activities, and facilitating communication among community members and external stakeholders.…”

Section: Components Of "One Community At a Time" Social Capital And N...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They may link local governments and residents, ensuring that attempts to enhance resilience consider vulnerable populations' opinions and needs. NGOs may also promote capacity-building activities, encourage stakeholder engagement, and assist with implementing, monitoring, and evaluating programs to increase resilience [22]. Academic and research institutions can support the development of community resilience by producing knowledge based on empirical research, creating novel solutions, and offering technical skills to support resilience-building strategies and initiatives [56].…”

Section: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The scholarly study has increased due to the rising importance of the "One Community at a Time" concept. The role of social capital [3,[20][21][22], local knowledge [5,12,23], governance [24][25][26][27], preparedness and response capacity [28][29][30], and adaptive infrastructure [31][32][33] are just a few recent topics that have been covered in recent literature concerning this localized approach to resilience. Although these studies have shed light on important issues, it is still unclear how the "One Community at a Time" approach's essential components may be successfully operationalized in reality [34].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

“One community at a time”: promoting community resilience in the face of natural hazards and public health challenges

Ma,

Qirui,

2023

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Resilience is vital for facing natural disasters and public health challenges. Despite the significance of resilience-building activities, there is a scarcity of locally-tailored planning and response strategies, leaving communities incapable of addressing the unique challenges posed by natural disasters and public health crises. This study aims to explore how the “One Community at a Time” approach enhances community resilience in facing natural hazards and public health challenges. Methods A systematic review was conducted over journal articles published from January 2001 to April 2023 through PRISMA approach. Multiple databases such as Web of Science and Scopus were thoroughly searched. We used independent screening by two researchers and painstaking data extraction using standardized forms. This approach was adopted to assure the reliability, validity, and precision of our study selection and analysis. The included studies’ quality was evaluated by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results In the evaluation, 35 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion and underwent in-depth examination. Several major components of “One Community at a Time” have been identified, including social capital and networks, local knowledge and learning, effective governance and leadership, preparedness and response capacity, and adaptive infrastructure and resources. This framework highlights the significance of individualized approaches to resilience-building initiatives, recognizing that each community has specific strengths, needs, and challenges. Conclusion Relevant stakeholders can adapt suitable resilient strategies to help prepare and recover from natural hazards and public health challenges. By adopting a localized strategy, stakeholders can collaborate to develop a culture of readiness and resilience, ultimately leading to more sustainable and resilient communities. This framework advises community-based groups, local government, and other stakeholders on prioritizing partnerships, preparedness planning, community participation, and leadership as essential components of creating and maintaining resilience. “One Community at a Time” framework offers practical guidance for community-based organizations, local government, and other stakeholders to prioritize partnerships, preparedness planning, community participation, and leadership as essential components of creating and sustaining resilience.

show abstract

Section: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Components Of "One Community At a Time" Social Capital And N...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Components Of "One Community At a Time" Social Capital And N...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Stakeholder Roles and Responsibilitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

“One community at a time”: promoting community resilience in the face of natural hazards and public health challenges

Ma,

Qirui,

2023

BMC Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Dynamic evolution of urban resilience and its coupling mechanism with EF3D-driven natural capital utilization: Case study in three typical urban agglomerations of China

Li,

Peng,

Chen

et al. 2024

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychological Resilience and Farmers’ Homestead Withdrawal: Evidence from Traditional Agricultural Regions in China

Xie

2023

Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of China’s rural homestead withdrawal policy has been a topic of great interest in recent years. However, little is known about its impact on farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior from the perspective of psychological resilience. This study aims to evaluate the impact of psychological resilience on farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior and to explore its mechanism and heterogeneity, as well as its impact on compensation choices. The research data was collected through a survey of 657 rural households in Shaanxi and Shandong provinces. The probit model and mediation effect model were used to analyze the data. The results demonstrate that psychological resilience positively affects farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior; this finding is robust. Specifically, the positive influence of stability and adaptability dimensions of psychological resilience is more significant. Moreover, the effect of psychological resilience varies across different family life cycles, and it has a stronger promoting effect on the homestead withdrawal behavior of child-raising families. Mechanism analysis indicates that psychological resilience can promote homestead withdrawal behavior by reducing farmers’ land dependence consciousness and improving farmers’ risk preferences. Finally, farmers with strong psychological resilience are more inclined to choose cash compensation. Based on these findings, this paper proposes targeted policy recommendations for rural homestead system reform.

show abstract

Social capital, serious mental illness, and the intersection of disaster: Recommendations for enabling resilience

Cited by 4 publications

References 31 publications

“One community at a time”: promoting community resilience in the face of natural hazards and public health challenges

“One community at a time”: promoting community resilience in the face of natural hazards and public health challenges

Dynamic evolution of urban resilience and its coupling mechanism with EF3D-driven natural capital utilization: Case study in three typical urban agglomerations of China

Psychological Resilience and Farmers’ Homestead Withdrawal: Evidence from Traditional Agricultural Regions in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About