2020
DOI: 10.1108/bfj-08-2019-0607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital, power and information sharing – evidence from the Dutch meat processing industry

Abstract: PurposeBuying companies in the food industry increasingly recognize the need to cultivate relationships with their suppliers. Social capital and power are important to understand buyer–supplier relationships. Maintaining these relationships appears highly dependent on the degree of information sharing.Design/methodology/approachThe study investigates how power and social capital dimensions are related to information sharing. A survey of first-tier suppliers in the Dutch meat processing industry was carried out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings point towards power relations issues (Gelderman et al , 2020; Kim et al , 2017; Petersen et al , 2008) as a contingency factor in buyer–supplier networks. Centrality and proximity in complex networks, as antecedents, exert the most influence on power disparity and tendering performance.…”
Section: Antecedents and Contingencies And Their Effect On Performancementioning
confidence: 60%
“…Our findings point towards power relations issues (Gelderman et al , 2020; Kim et al , 2017; Petersen et al , 2008) as a contingency factor in buyer–supplier networks. Centrality and proximity in complex networks, as antecedents, exert the most influence on power disparity and tendering performance.…”
Section: Antecedents and Contingencies And Their Effect On Performancementioning
confidence: 60%
“…The relationship between SCT and supply chain practices yet is presented through correlations among factors, and little is now known about how the social capital elements could develop best supply chain practices (e.g. Gelderman et al, 2020;Kilubi and Rogers, 2018;Lu et al, 2018;Shin et al, 2019). In other words, further studies need to go beyond a limited focus on performance issues to introduce also a practice approach that can reveal hidden SCT elements.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, we aim to identify further connections between SCT and SCS, since the current correlations are broad and generic (e.g. Gelderman et al, 2020;Kilubi and Rogers, 2018;Lu et al, 2018;Shin et al, 2019). Despite SCT has received increased attention in the SCM literature , it is limited in terms of SCS (Lu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by Cohendet and Llerena (2005), this means to assimilate the farmer to a knowledge processor: more precisely, the micro-AKIS perspective allows us to emphasize the networking activities the farmers carry out, in order to acquire significant information and knowledge to adopt innovation. We explore these knowledge networks through the lens of social capital, a fundamental concept that has been recently recalled to explain mechanisms of innovation adoption in the agricultural sector (Gelderman et al, 2020). Set against this background, the micro-AKIS system built by the farmers is the outcome of networking activities the farmers carry out.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%