2003
DOI: 10.1136/sti.79.1.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital, poverty, and income inequality as predictors of gonorrhoea, syphilis, chlamydia and AIDS case rates in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
161
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
13
161
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…12,[45][46][47] Further research is needed to better understand how hardship conditions affect HIV risk for Black MSM, including exploring intersections between measures of various types and levels of hardships. Future research can build on these results by exploring whether individual-level hardships interact with area-level hardships to predict HIV risk in Black MSM and what is the impact of geo-political location on these associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,[45][46][47] Further research is needed to better understand how hardship conditions affect HIV risk for Black MSM, including exploring intersections between measures of various types and levels of hardships. Future research can build on these results by exploring whether individual-level hardships interact with area-level hardships to predict HIV risk in Black MSM and what is the impact of geo-political location on these associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we were unable to determine if this association was truly contextual, and we did not find any support for the hypotheses that neighborhood joblessness and the ratio of men to women play important roles in determining sexual network position in this sample, our results suggest that the well-documented association between poverty and STI rates may operate through sexual network structure. [1][2][3][4][5][6]8 Further study of this possible mechanism should attempt to confirm these results in a larger sample, distinguish between contextual and compositional effects, and further elucidate how neighborhood socioeconomic environment may shape network structure. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation has been found to be strongly associated with various features of the socioeconomic environment, including income, unemployment, and education, [1][2][3][4][5] family structure, 6,7 community physical disorder, 1 racial/ethnic composition, 3,4,7 social capital, 5,8 racial/ethnic income inequalities, 6 and racial/ethnic residential segregation. 6 In particular, poor neighborhoods with high proportions of African American residents suffer from disproportionately high sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of social capital has also been inversely related to the rates of teen pregnancy, STDs, and AIDS at the state level. 19,20 The PHDCN measure pertained to parents watching over the children of the neighborhood, keeping them out of trouble. Where that trouble stems from idle time or opportunities for sex, a high degree of social capital could result in a delayed onset of first sex, less frequent sex, and fewer STDs.…”
Section: Neighborhood Characteristics and Stdsmentioning
confidence: 99%