2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
135
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
135
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty of diffusion of tacit knowledge through modern IT has been addressed and recognized by different authors (HaldinHerrgard, 2000, Nonaka andTakeuchi, 1995). For instance Yang (2009) argues that modern IT can provide many possibilities to diffuse explicit knowledge but tacitness is hard to diffuse technologically. IS and KM approaches suggest that in order for tacit knowledge to be transferred it needs to be codified first.…”
Section: It Implications To Tacit Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty of diffusion of tacit knowledge through modern IT has been addressed and recognized by different authors (HaldinHerrgard, 2000, Nonaka andTakeuchi, 1995). For instance Yang (2009) argues that modern IT can provide many possibilities to diffuse explicit knowledge but tacitness is hard to diffuse technologically. IS and KM approaches suggest that in order for tacit knowledge to be transferred it needs to be codified first.…”
Section: It Implications To Tacit Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the concept of social capital has been an area of focus in academic seeking to explain organizational network relationships, knowledge management activities, the creation of organizational knowledge and sharing (Chang & Chuang, 2011;Chow & Chan, 2008;Hau et al, 2013;Yang & Farn, 2009), individual/ organizational creativity (Liu, 2013, organizational innovativeness (Turgut, 2013), organizational performance improvement (Lawson et al, 2008), corporate ethics (Ayios et al, 2010), and both individual and career outcomes (Zhang, Liu, Loi, Lau, & Ngo, 2010). Other researchers have also investigated the relation of social capital with innovation (Fountain, 1998;Maskell 2000), workplace discrimination (Gray, Kurihara, Hommen, & Feldman, 2007), organizational learning (Fisher & White, 2000), and employee turnover rates (Shaw, Duffy, Johnson, & Lockhart, 2005).…”
Section: Social Capital Of Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human behavior or deed is a social influence to implement or not to implement (Kuo & Young, 2008;Parent et al, 2007), however, approaches towards knowledge transfer reflect individual readiness to implement an act or conduct. Organizational attitude or approach obviously influences the transfer of knowledge Yang & Farn, 2009). Koballa (1988) and Ajzen (2001) argues in their theories that attitude and idiosyncratic customs are determinant of individual purpose to implement an act.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%