2005
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyi035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital and the history of mortality in Britain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence of social class gradients in infant mortality, with low‐status infants being more likely to die than high‐status infants (Razzell and Spence, ). Expectation of life at age twenty, however, was in the range of 39–43 years (Hollingsworth, ), regardless of socioeconomic status (Razzell and Spence, ; Razzell and Spence, ). DeWitte et al () found a lack of compelling differences in mortality between high‐and low‐status adults, but elevated mortality and reduced survival among low‐status juveniles in a skeletal sample from industrializing London.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence of social class gradients in infant mortality, with low‐status infants being more likely to die than high‐status infants (Razzell and Spence, ). Expectation of life at age twenty, however, was in the range of 39–43 years (Hollingsworth, ), regardless of socioeconomic status (Razzell and Spence, ; Razzell and Spence, ). DeWitte et al () found a lack of compelling differences in mortality between high‐and low‐status adults, but elevated mortality and reduced survival among low‐status juveniles in a skeletal sample from industrializing London.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among rich and poor populations even fine gradations in relative poverty have been associated with differences in survival [1], [2]. It is less clear if this has always been the case [3]. Pre-1900, being able to reach or afford health care would have been of limited benefit, and in predominantly rural communities, exposure to crowds and infectious diseases may have been limited among the poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Robertson, Coall, McAullay, & Nannup, 2019, p. 5) Emlen's (1995) theory on the evolution of family structure in response to ecology indicates those living in unsettled ecologies had more children but higher maternal, infant and child mortality. In the United Kingdom and other North European nations, where women were mostly unable to take charge of their fertility, this pattern continued until the beginning of the 20th century (Razzell & Spence, 2005;Woods, 2000). Nyoongar people almost certainly had fewer children and much lower maternal, infant and child mortality.…”
Section: Family and Community Structurementioning
confidence: 99%