Social Capital and Networks in Film and TV: Jobs for the Boys?

Abstract

Social capital has been hailed as a means of virtuous, effective and enjoyable productivity through which firms can flourish. But it also confines advantage to network members and discriminates against non-members. This paper, drawing on detailed qualitative research into work in the UK film and TV industry, reveals the advantages and the disadvantages of social capital. Social capital aided recruitment, policed quality standards and ensured behavioural norms with the sort of speed and flexibility it would be hard to identify in other forms of organizing. However, it also advantaged white, middle-class men and ensured that middle-class signals came to be proxies for the most sought-after jobs. Professionals who were women, members of ethnic minorities or working class were less likely to secure jobs and were often restricted in the type of jobs they held. Significantly, the members of disadvantaged groups who succeeded did so after long periods employed by the terrestrial broadcasters or after extended apprenticeships. This is worrying, given the increasing insecurity of the labour market in this sector.

The Real Cost of Childcare: Motherhood and Flexible Creative Labour in the UK Film Industry - Review Essay

“…Increasingly there is empirical evidence that relying on personal networks and informal employment practices give men and women different outcomes in the job market (Bielby and Bielby 1993;Bielby and Bielby 2002;Christopherson 2008;Gill 2002;Grugulis and Stoyanova 2012). The reasons for this inequality are not the focus of this article, but it is worth mentioning that motherhood plays a considerable part in the differences of outcome.…”

Diamonds are a girl’s best friend …? Examining gender and careers in the jewellery industry

“…In addition to direct work related exclusion, studies also indicate that women in male dominated occupations face barriers to social networks as a result of what Kanter calls homo-social behaviour (Kanter, 1977;Fisher and Kinsey, 2014;Gregory, 2009;Grugulis and Stoyanova, 2012).…”

Do Women Suffer from Network Closure? The Moderating Effect of Social Capital on Gender Inequality in a Project-Based Labor Market, 1929 to 2010

“…If recruitment is to a great extent a result of interpersonal networks, there is a tendency to exclude and discriminate actors based on ascriptive characteristics, regardless of talent (Bourdieu 1984;DiMaggio and Garip 2012;Lin 1999Lin , 2001). Qualitative research suggests that women in particular suffer from labor markets structured by informal recruitment practices (Christopherson 2009;Grugulis and Stoyanova 2012).…”