Social Behaviour and Recognition in Decapod Shrimps, with Emphasis on the Caridea

Chak, Solomon T. C.; Bauer, Raymond T.; Thiel, Martín

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17599-7_5

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 94 publications

(121 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The social interaction impact is also evident in shrimp species. In particular, aggression and cannibalism are very common in shrimp (Chak, Bauer, & Thiel, 2015). Furthermore, these behaviours become more evident when stocking density is high and feeding frequency is low.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Meta‐analysis of genetic parameters of production traits in cultured shrimp species

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genetic parameters of growth, reproductive efficiency and survival are important for designing successful genetic improvement programmes. In this study, a database was assembled and a meta-analysis was conducted using 87 peer-reviewed published studies on genetic parameters of 63 economically important traits reported across nine major farmed shrimp species. A total of 641 estimates of heritability, 978 estimates of genetic correlations and 658 estimates of phenotypic correlations were included in this study. Pacific white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) was the most widely reported species followed by giant freshwater prawn (Marcobrachium rosenbergii) and black tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon). Published studies demonstrate large variability across heritability and correlation estimates. Consensus estimates were based on both unweighted and weighted averages. The traits were broadly classed into weight, morphology, growth rate, body composition, feeding efficiency, reproductive efficiency and survival. This meta-analysis revealed moderate-to-high heritability estimates for weight (0.30 ± 0.002), morphological (0.26 ± 0.003), growth rate (0.27 ± 0.01) and feeding efficiency (0.58 ± 0.07) traits, but low for body composition (0.06 ± 0.009), reproductive efficiency (0.11 ± 0.006) and survival traits (0.15 ± 0.003). Strong responses to selection were found among the shrimp species studied. We have developed a ShinyApp (https://khatk ar.shiny apps.io/shrimp_genet ics/) for visualization of the individual heritability estimates. In addition to the metaanalysis of genetic parameters, we have calculated the correlated responses among economically important traits and highlighted response to selection, realized heritability, social interaction and common environmental effects in shrimp breeding programmes in terms of industry implications. Consensus estimates suggest that there is sufficient additive genetic variation to carry out effective genetic improvement programmes in these species. K E Y W O R D S genetic and phenotypic correlation, genetic improvement, heritability, prawn, review | 1151 HASAN et Al. | 1153 HASAN et Al. TA B L E 1 Number of studies, study ID, species, country and trait abbreviation a of the traits studied Study No.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The social interaction impact is also evident in shrimp species. In particular, aggression and cannibalism are very common in shrimp (Chak, Bauer, & Thiel, 2015).…”

Section: The Social Interaction and Indirect Genetic Effects In Shrimpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta‐analysis of genetic parameters of production traits in cultured shrimp species

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, in the scientific literature the term "social control of reproduction" has gained a more specific meaning, which goes beyond the aggressive exclusion of sexual rivals from an area or a mate. Thus, for example, we find reference to social control in multiple instances such as caste determination and reproduction and queen/worker conflict in eusocial hymenopterans [13,14], mammals and crustaceans [15,16]; reproduction in cooperative breeders [17]; temporal sex allocation in sequential hermaphrodites, where subordinates delay or forego sex change [18,19]. In these cases, the term "social control" often implies a mechanism actively initiated by the dominant breeder(s), which usually triggers temporarily or permanent phenotypic changes in group members (behavioural, morphological and physiological, including hormonal changes), regulates their reproductive output and ultimately determines the reproductive skew.…”

Section: Social Control Of Reproductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Social regulation of reproduction: control or signal?

Benvenuto¹,

Lorenzi²

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traditionally, dominant breeders have been considered able to control other individuals’ reproduction in multi-member groups with high variance in reproductive success/reproductive skew (e.g., forced sterility on subordinate conspecifics in eusocial animals; suppression of sex change in sequential hermaphrodites). These actions are typically presented as active impositions by reproductively dominant individuals. However, how can individuals regulate the physiological reproductive state of others? Alternatively, less reproductively successful individuals could self-restrain from reproduction in presence of dominant breeders. Shifting perspective from a top-down manipulation to a broader view (which includes all contestants) and using a multi-taxa approach, we propose a resolution of reproductive-skew conflicts based on signalling rather than control, along a continuum of levels of strategic regulation of reproduction.

show abstract

“…In eusocial insects [77], cleaning shrimp [22], and naked mole rats [103], identification of noncolony intruders is olfactory, although some social insects also use visual cues. In human beings there are many different in-group markers for breeding populations that use different senses.…”

Section: In-group Breeding Population Markers In General and In Humanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Religion’s Possible Role in Facilitating Eusocial Human Societies. A Behavioral Biology (Ethological) Perspective

Feierman

2016

Studia Humana

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eusociality is the most successful animal social system on earth. It is found in many social insects, a few crustacean species, and only three vertebrates: two African naked mole rats and human beings. Eusociality, so unusual for a vertebrate, is one of main factors leading to human beings becoming the most successful land vertebrate on earth by almost any measure. We are also unique in being the only land vertebrate with religions. Could the two be related? This article will present evidence, illustrated primarily with Judaism and Christianity, that these two seemingly unrelated social systems – eusociality and religion – that correlate temporally in our evolution, are possibly related. Evidence will also be presented that a (mostly) non-reproducing exemplar caste of celibate clergy was a eusocial-facilitating aspect of religion in western social evolution.

show abstract

Social Behaviour and Recognition in Decapod Shrimps, with Emphasis on the Caridea

Cited by 14 publications

References 94 publications

Meta‐analysis of genetic parameters of production traits in cultured shrimp species

Meta‐analysis of genetic parameters of production traits in cultured shrimp species

Social regulation of reproduction: control or signal?

Religion’s Possible Role in Facilitating Eusocial Human Societies. A Behavioral Biology (Ethological) Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About