1991
DOI: 10.2307/3350104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Behavior, Public Policy, and Nonharmful Drug Use

Abstract: A body of research conducted over several decades has established that a considerable proportion of regular users of heroin, cocaine, and other psychoactive drugs continue to function effectively at work and in other areas of social life. Yet American policy has been predicated on assumptions of a universal course of drug use leading to dependency and dysfunctional behavior. A rational drug policy would be shaped in light of a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between drug use and socially adaptiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That drug use renders individuals less economically productive is very difficult to establish empirically. Miron & Zwiebel (1995) refute the argument referring to work by Normand et al (1994) and Winick (1991), which suggests that if anything, except for the heaviest users, there exists a positive relationship between individual earnings and self-reported drug use or at least no negative relationship. The motivation for questioning the relationship between drug use and labour market outcomes is the recognition of the possible simultaneity of drug use and wages, and the existence of unobserved heterogeneity, which raise questions about the direction of causality in a wage equation involving a measure of drug use as an explanatory variable.…”
Section: Productivity and Labour Supplymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…That drug use renders individuals less economically productive is very difficult to establish empirically. Miron & Zwiebel (1995) refute the argument referring to work by Normand et al (1994) and Winick (1991), which suggests that if anything, except for the heaviest users, there exists a positive relationship between individual earnings and self-reported drug use or at least no negative relationship. The motivation for questioning the relationship between drug use and labour market outcomes is the recognition of the possible simultaneity of drug use and wages, and the existence of unobserved heterogeneity, which raise questions about the direction of causality in a wage equation involving a measure of drug use as an explanatory variable.…”
Section: Productivity and Labour Supplymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Much research in the drug treatment field is carried out within the framework of medicine or psychology and in the context of treatment programmes working with a notion of drug use as an illness or behavioural disorder, which can be cured (Turk et al, 1986). Conclusions are then based on small groups of dysfunctional drug users attending treatment and can be mistakenly generalized to all people who use drugs in different ways (Winnick, 1991). As a consequence, there is an absence not only of drug treatment literature in social work journals, but also of knowledge about drug-using social work clients who do not attend treatment agencies.…”
Section: Drug Treatment; Models Of Drug Misuse Solutions and Effectimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may seem excessive, because many users of even so-called hard drugs do not experience negative consequences of their use. 26 However, the implications of a drug-related arrest for a future physician's career make any illicit drug use risky, even if the risk of other negative consequences of sporadic use may not be so great as commonly believed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%