2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social attention and scientific articles on stroke: Altmetric analysis of top-50 articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
39
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…25,28 Recently, alternative web-based metrics, named altmetrics , have been created owing to the emergence and popularity of social media. 15 Altmetric the company tracks and quantifies the dissemination of research on various social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook, and online news stories, to generate an aggregate score called the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). 2,3,28 Various potential benefits of using altmetrics as opposed to traditional bibliometrics have been proposed: altmetrics allow for the assessment of publication impact beyond academia and the evaluation of different types of less commonly cited scholarly content, such as data sets and software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,28 Recently, alternative web-based metrics, named altmetrics , have been created owing to the emergence and popularity of social media. 15 Altmetric the company tracks and quantifies the dissemination of research on various social media platforms, such as Twitter, Facebook, and online news stories, to generate an aggregate score called the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS). 2,3,28 Various potential benefits of using altmetrics as opposed to traditional bibliometrics have been proposed: altmetrics allow for the assessment of publication impact beyond academia and the evaluation of different types of less commonly cited scholarly content, such as data sets and software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Correlation statistics between the AAS and citation counts have ranged from moderately high 16,21 to fairly weak, 8,12 whereas the AAS and journal impact factor have been found to be weakly associated. 9,15,21 Xia et al 29 analyzed the correlation between tweets and citations of articles in Nature across differing publication years, disciplines, and Twitter user types and reported a discrepancy between the most cited articles and most tweeted articles, suggesting that altmetrics and citation-based metrics may be assessing different types of impact. However, research containing important social and cultural implications may be otherwise neglected by traditional citation-based and impact factor metrics, 22 and the significance of the AAS may vary by field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the articles were published in 2017, likely because we performed the Altmetric Explorer search on May 25, 2018. e same method used in the article written by Kim et al, co-author of this article, was used here [5]. AAS was sensitive to the latest content, and recent publications tended to receive higher AAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the methods of Kim et al [5]. e AAS and the Altmetric donut are designed to make it easy to identify how much and what type of attention a particular research output has received [6].…”
Section: Search Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, en nuestro estudio los artículos de revisión y consenso captaron más atención mediática que los originales de acuerdo con autores previos, aunque no se trate de contenido original y posiblemente estén sobrerrepresentados en este tipo de análisis 9,10 . Respecto al 32% que aportó este tipo de artículos en nuestro estudio, este porcentaje es similar al de otros análisis bibliométricos recientes sobre los artículos históricamente más citados de disciplinas y temas biomédicos como la Dermatología (25%) 11 , la leucoplasia oral (37%) 12 o el accidente cerebrovascular (36%) 13 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified