Social and structural conditions for the avoidance of advance care planning in neuro-oncology: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundPrimary brain tumours newly affect >260 000 people each year worldwide. In the UK, every year >10 000 people are diagnosed with a brain tumour while >5000 die annually from the disease. Prognoses are poor, cognitive deterioration common and patients have prolonged palliative needs. Advance care planning (ACP) may enable early discussion of future care decisions. Although a core commitment in the UK healthcare strategy, and the shared responsibility of clinical teams, ACP appears uncommon in practice. Evidence around ACP practice in neuro-oncology is limited.ObjectivesWe aimed to elicit key social and structural conditions contributing to the avoidance of ACP in neuro-oncology.DesignA cross-sectional qualitative study design was used.SettingOne tertiary care hospital in the UK.ParticipantsFifteen healthcare professionals working in neuro-oncology participated in this study, including neuro-oncologists, neurosurgeons, clinical nurse specialists, allied healthcare professionals and a neurologist.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted with participants to explore their assumptions and experiences of ACP. Data were analysed thematically using the well-established framework method.ResultsParticipants recognised the importance of ACP but few had ever completed formal ACP documentation. We identified eight key factors, which we suggest comprise three main conditions for avoidance: (1) difficulties being a highly emotive, time-intensive practice requiring the right ‘window of opportunity’ and (2) presence and availability of others; (3) ambiguities in ACP definition, purpose and practice. Combined, these created a ‘culture of shared avoidance’.ConclusionIn busy clinical environments, ‘shared responsibility’ is interpreted as ‘others’ responsibility’ laying the basis for a culture of avoidance. To address this, we suggest a ‘generalists and specialists’ model of ACP, wherein healthcare professionals undertake particular responsibilities. Healthcare professionals are already adopting this model informally, but without formalised structure it is likely to fail given a tendency for people to assume a generalist role.

Advance Care Planning in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Scoping Review

“…Llewellyn et al (2018) [ 77 ] involved key HPs working in neuro oncology in order to investigate their experiences and assumptions on ACP. Few HPs had completed a formal ACP document.…”

Postoperative nursing process of a pregnant patient with meningioma: a case report

“…Th e area of coping-stress tolerance pattern included the diagnosis of the ineff ective coping of family. Family members, who maintain care for the patient with a brain tumor, may suff er from many problems, such as fatigue, loss of appetite, urinary problems, and physiological problems, such as lack of sleep, cognitive problems, such as lack of attention, psychological problems, such as the desire to cry, nervous laughter, no desire to talk, the overdesire to talk, sense of distress, weakness, hopelessness, fear, anxiety and depression, as well as changes in personal care [27]. The patient's family had many of the changes and problems described in the literature.…”

Understanding care when cure is not likely for young adults who face cancer: a realist analysis of data from patients, families and healthcare professionals

“…The ‘window of opportunity’17 often fails to appear, thus in some cases the topic is avoided. This has the potential to delay adaptation and limit the time available for professional support, which could help young adults plan and make as much as possible of remaining time 25. For those with dependents, particularly young children, delaying adaptation could impact on their roles as parents, delaying the opportunity to prepare and create memories for themselves and their families 23.…”