1985
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1985.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and non-social knowledge in vervet monkeys

Abstract: The social knowledge of East African vervet monkeys is striking. W ithin a local population the monkeys recognize individuals, and associate each individual with its particular group. W ithin groups, the monkeys recognize dominance relations, rank orders, and matrilineal kinship, and they remember who has behaved affinitively towards them in the past. Outside the social domain, however, vervets appear to know surprisingly little about other aspects of their environment. Although they do distinguish the differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several conclusions could follow from such results: (1) Monkeys may be incapable of rehearsing; (2) they may have to be instructed or prompted as to when or how to rehearse (frequently true for humans and a potentially important factor); or (3) they may not rehearse information in this context, but might do so in more natural contexts, such as social, sexual, or aggressive encounters. It is possible that the representational processes of the monkeys are specifically attuned to the processing of specific aspects of their environment, such as the social behavior of other monkeys (Cheney & Seyfarth, 1985). Thus, sexual or aggressive encounters might promote rehearsal in a way in which our nonsocial pictorial stimuli did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several conclusions could follow from such results: (1) Monkeys may be incapable of rehearsing; (2) they may have to be instructed or prompted as to when or how to rehearse (frequently true for humans and a potentially important factor); or (3) they may not rehearse information in this context, but might do so in more natural contexts, such as social, sexual, or aggressive encounters. It is possible that the representational processes of the monkeys are specifically attuned to the processing of specific aspects of their environment, such as the social behavior of other monkeys (Cheney & Seyfarth, 1985). Thus, sexual or aggressive encounters might promote rehearsal in a way in which our nonsocial pictorial stimuli did not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social intelligence hypotheses have attracted recent support but the debate is not settled, and several authors have pointed out that the domains are difficult to separate [6,[17][18][19][20][21]. This issue, together with controversies over whether social cognition and social learning are adaptive specializations [22,23] and overmodularity in primate cognition [24,25], would be clarified by knowledge about the extent to which measures of social and ecological performance covary [20]. While factors ranging from social group size to diet [12,16,20,26] correlate positively with primate brain volumes, the patterns of association between these factors [20], their relationship to a concept of primate intelligence and the consanguinity of non-human primate and human intelligence remain contentious and poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, auditory communication signals (i.e., speciesspecific vocalizations) are especially important in the socioecology of several species of nonhuman primates (Cheney and Seyfarth 1985;Eimas 1994;Eimas et al 1971;Hauser 1997;Jusczyk 1997;Jusczyk et al 1983; Miller and Eimas 1995), such as rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Vocalizations convey information about the identity and the age of the caller and often provide information about sex and emotional or motivational state (Cheney and Seyfarth 1990; Hauser 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the benefits and importance of language in human evolution are obvious (Carruthers 2002;Hauser 1997;Lieberman 2002), other nonhuman communication systems are also important. These communication systems are important because for most, if not all, species they are critical to the species' survival (Andersson 1996;Bennett et al 1997;Greenfield 2002;Hauser 1997;Lau et al 2000;Mech and Boitani 2003).For example, auditory communication signals (i.e., speciesspecific vocalizations) are especially important in the socioecology of several species of nonhuman primates (Cheney and Seyfarth 1985;Eimas 1994;Eimas et al 1971;Hauser 1997;Jusczyk 1997;Jusczyk et al 1983; Miller and Eimas 1995), such as rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Vocalizations convey information about the identity and the age of the caller and often provide information about sex and emotional or motivational state (Cheney and Seyfarth 1990; Hauser 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%