Urban Land Markets 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8862-9_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and Economic Impacts of Land Titling Programs in Urban and Periurban Areas: A Short Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if profitable projects exist, legal restrictions on land sales (Sundet 2004), limited commercial value of the land (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2005;Payne et al 2008), and social or political considerations that limit foreclosure may jeopardize realization of credit effects. This implies that such credit may be realized less readily than is sometimes suggested.…”
Section: Environment For Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if profitable projects exist, legal restrictions on land sales (Sundet 2004), limited commercial value of the land (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2005;Payne et al 2008), and social or political considerations that limit foreclosure may jeopardize realization of credit effects. This implies that such credit may be realized less readily than is sometimes suggested.…”
Section: Environment For Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11. See reference 9, Payne et al (2007); also Mooya, M and C Cloete (2010), "Property rights, real estate markets and poverty alleviation in namibia's urban low income settlements", Habitat International Vol 34, no 4, pages 436-445.…”
Section: A Land Housing and Tenure Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current debate increasingly revolves around the question of empirical evidence for the benefits and pitfalls of land formalisation (Benjaminsen 2006;Payne et al 2007). Thereby the question is raised whether titling programmes are the most effective and appropriate means of realising the social and economic objectives claimed or whether these could also be realised by improving the way existing systems of tenure operate or adopting more gradual shifts from existing informal regimes to more formal systems (Benjaminsen 2006;Payne et al 2007). Benjaminsen (2006) stresses the importance of examining whether there is a demand for formalisation, whose demand it is and for what kind of formalisation.…”
Section: The Current Debate: Different Channels Of Land Tenure Formalmentioning
confidence: 99%