Social and cognitive approaches to depression: Towards a new synthesis

Champion, Lorna; Power, Michael

doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1995.tb01484.x

Cited by 69 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…378 Interventions that address this theory therefore seek to equip the woman with self-efficacy so that she is better able to manage such events or difficulties or has multiple strategies by which she might attempt to address them. Increased self-efficacy may be seen in the management of her own symptoms or, more generally, in being able to cope with the practical aspects of motherhood that might otherwise be viewed as difficult or problematic.…”

Section: Results Of Realist Synthesis: What Work For Whom?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

Morrell

Sutcliffe

Booth

et al. 2016

Health Technol Assess

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression C Jane Morrell, 1 * Paul Sutcliffe, 2 Andrew Booth, 3 John Stevens, 3 This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hta This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 11/95/03. The contractual start date was in November 2012. The draft report began editorial review in August 2014 and was accepted for publication in June 2015. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HTA programme or the Department ...

show abstract

Section: Results Of Realist Synthesis: What Work For Whom?mentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

Morrell

Sutcliffe

Booth

et al. 2016

Health Technol Assess

105

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Depressive symptoms in late life may be manifested in different ways, each of which suggest potential mechanisms for the relation between depression and mortality (37). For example, depressive symptoms can result in cognitive symptoms, such as disturbances in thinking, problem solving, and selfefficacy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Depressive Symptoms and 3-Year Mortality in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients

Covinsky¹,

Kahana²,

et al. 1999

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some of these approaches were developed solely in the clinical context (e.g., Beck, 1976) and therefore show a lack of integration of the most recent advances in cognitive psychology. These clinical-based approaches typically present an inappropriate view of, for example, reasoning in ordinary healthy individuals, and, consequently, can fail to see similarities as well as differences between reasoning in depression and reasoning in non-depressed individuals (see Champion & Power, 1995;Power & Champion, 1986;Power & Wykes, 1996;Quelhas & Power, 1991), or of reasoning in schizophrenia (e.g., Quelhas, 1987). Just to give an example, the idea that healthy non-depressed individuals reason in a logical way (e.g., see proposals by Beck, 1976, in the case of depression; Arieti, 1974 andMatte-Blanco, 1976, in the case of schizophrenia) leads to the incorrect view that reasoning performance by comparison is almost always biased in such patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Counterfactual thinking and functional differences in depression

Quelhas

Power

Juhos

et al. 2008

Clin Psychology and Psychoth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the studies reported in this paper was to evaluate the function of counterfactual thinking (CT) in depression. In Experiment 1, depressed and non-depressed participants were asked to imagine themselves as the protagonist of a hypothetical situation, and to think counterfactually about three different scenarios. The results showed that there was a similar CT style (in terms of direction, structure and focus of mutation) for the depressed and the nondepressed groups. It was also found that the perceived preparation for a future similar situation increased after CT and, contrary to our hypotheses, this effect was observed in both groups. In Experiment 2, a real-life situation was used (a course examination) in which participants experienced a negative outcome (a poor score on the test). Again, it was observed that depressed and non-depressed participants showed the same CT style, but non-depressed participants were more likely to use CT spontaneously. In addition, the second study showed further differences between the two groups: depressed participants not only showed a lack of cognitive benefi ts from thinking counterfactually (i.e., after CT they do not feel more prepared for future similar events, nor able to avoid a similar bad outcome, in contrast to the non-depressed participants), but also show a lack of behavioural changes (both intentions to change and actual changes over the subsequent week). In conclusion, these results provide evidence about the function of CT both in depressed and in non-depressed thinking, and highlight both the similarities and differences for these two groups.

show abstract

Social and cognitive approaches to depression: Towards a new synthesis

Cited by 69 publications

References 32 publications

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

Depressive Symptoms and 3-Year Mortality in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients

Counterfactual thinking and functional differences in depression

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About