2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social & psychological factors associated with oral analgesic use in knee osteoarthritis management

Abstract: Objective:Determine modifiable social and psychological health factors that are associated with use of oral opioid and non-opioid medications for OA. Methods:Patients were categorized based on use of the following oral medications: opioids (with/without other oral analgesic treatments), non-opioid analgesics, and no oral analgesic treatment. We used multinomial logistic regression models to estimate adjusted relative risk ratios (RRRs) of using an opioid or a non-opioid analgesic (vs. no oral analgesic treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning pain medication use, the literature confirms an at least indirect relationship between the level of general anxiety and/or depressive symptoms and the amount of pain medication used [55,75,100,102,108,118,126,133] and the odds of using opioids [86,94,96,121,122]. Furthermore, the level of catastrophizing was directly related with the odds for using pain medication in general [53,84,89].…”
Section: Discussion Of Confirmed Associationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning pain medication use, the literature confirms an at least indirect relationship between the level of general anxiety and/or depressive symptoms and the amount of pain medication used [55,75,100,102,108,118,126,133] and the odds of using opioids [86,94,96,121,122]. Furthermore, the level of catastrophizing was directly related with the odds for using pain medication in general [53,84,89].…”
Section: Discussion Of Confirmed Associationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Sum scores on the Downs and Black checklist ranged between 8/16 and 15/16 (mean: 12.3/16) for cross-sectional studies (n = 47) [ 7 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 ], 10/18 and 17/18 (mean: 12.5/18) for observational cohort studies (n = 26) [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations