1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb00655.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social adjustment and interaction after severe head injury

Abstract: The social adjustment of 11 severely head injured patients was assessed using the KATZ adjustment scale. The result suggested that the group had poor social adjustment, and on many dimensions was similar to a psychiatric population. The head-injured patients also had social interaction difficulties as assessed by a range of observational and self-report measures. When compared to an out-patient and non-clinical group they had poor social performance, high social anxiety and low self-esteem. The implications of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a variety of measures of behavioural and cognitive function, chosen on the basis of their reported utility -in the appropriate fields 14 (Table 1), we examined a group of 11 severely head-injured young adults who were currently attending an occupational therapy day centre for the physically handicapped. Patient group details are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a variety of measures of behavioural and cognitive function, chosen on the basis of their reported utility -in the appropriate fields 14 (Table 1), we examined a group of 11 severely head-injured young adults who were currently attending an occupational therapy day centre for the physically handicapped. Patient group details are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, research indicates that affective and emotional symptoms, including anxiety and depression, are commonly observed sequelae among head-injured individuals [16,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. However, prevalence estimates of affective symptoms have varied widely among studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37][38][39] Basically, the Theory theory approach posits that normal people can read another person's mind by acquiring and deploying a commonsense ToM, something very similar to a scientific theory. [41][42][43] Patients' difficulty in flexibly changing their point of view could affect their ability to interpret and manage social interactions. In contrast, according to the Simulation theory, attributors use their mental mechanisms to calculate and predict the mental processes of others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%