2011
DOI: 10.1177/0950017011407969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social access in the workplace: are ethnographers gossips?

Abstract: This article is intended as a contribution to our understanding of what it means to gain and retain ‘social access’ in workplace ethnography, in particular examining the role of gossip. Several difficulties encountered in attempting to gain such access within a health care setting are analysed – these difficulties having arisen after formal, physical access had been successfully negotiated. The analysis reveals the importance of participation in workplace gossip and the length of time spent in the field as fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Issues of social access (Carmel, 2011) arose especially when it came to locating key informants. Key informants were hard to access and the majority of them were eventually reached through personal network.…”
Section: Research Process and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Issues of social access (Carmel, 2011) arose especially when it came to locating key informants. Key informants were hard to access and the majority of them were eventually reached through personal network.…”
Section: Research Process and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short informal field interviews with instructors and students were conducted in connection with all observations. With rooting in an ongoing ethnographic project, the authors had prior understandings of the context under study and had previously established entry-level access and social access (i.e., Brapport^) with the student groups (Carmel 2011;Punch 1986), which facilitated the collection of spontaneous informant accounts through field interviews. Field interviews were conducted on-site directly before or after follow-up sessions (for example, during breaks and lunch) and revolved around evolving themes pertaining to the observed sessions or questions raised by the observer regarding interpretations of sessions.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers should consider appropriate attire (Delamont, 2002) Researchers may participate in off topic conversations, and even (with caution) local gossip, to be seen as part of the team (Carmel, 2011). Researchers may choose not to share their own views which contrast to dominant discourse in the setting (Molloy, 2015) Researchers may perform "emotion work" to present a neutral response to comments or activities that they find emotive (Blix & Wettergren, 2015).…”
Section: Macro Visibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%