2021
DOI: 10.17227/ppo.num26-14383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobre putas y prostitutas

Abstract: Este artículo de reflexión, en el marco de la investigación doctoral en curso, expone una mirada crítica a las posturas abolicionistas de la prostitución. Se articula en torno a la pregunta: ¿qué implicaciones tienen las concepciones sobre las prostitutas en la vida de las putas, que no derivamos nuestro sustento de serlo? La reflexión plantea cuatro implicaciones que resultan peligrosas para todas las mujeres: i) las posturas abolicionistas de la prostitución nos infantilizan y ponen en duda nuestra capacidad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes with multiple probes were selected based on the lowest P-value. We used R package″ MetaVolcanoR″ [49] to incorporate multiple PCa cohorts with microarray data measured from different platforms for conducting the meta-analysis analysis. We applied both the vote counting approach that identifies differential expressed genes (DEG) for each study, and the Combining-approach that summarizes the fold change of a gene in different studies by the mean and calculates the gene differential expression P values using the Fisher method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genes with multiple probes were selected based on the lowest P-value. We used R package″ MetaVolcanoR″ [49] to incorporate multiple PCa cohorts with microarray data measured from different platforms for conducting the meta-analysis analysis. We applied both the vote counting approach that identifies differential expressed genes (DEG) for each study, and the Combining-approach that summarizes the fold change of a gene in different studies by the mean and calculates the gene differential expression P values using the Fisher method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67] The pooled HR was calculated by a fixed effect model, [68] provided the I 2 statistic was less than 30% or the fixed effects P value for the I 2 statistic was greater than 0.10, indicating insignificant heterogeneity across studies. [69] Statistical Analysis: The RNA-seq, microarray or clinical data was acquired from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, [70,71] NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository 49 , Oncomine, [72] and literature. Microarray data for the Meta analysis was uniformly normalized by logarithm transformation (log2).…”
Section: Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (Chip-seq)mentioning
confidence: 99%