2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clysa.2016.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobre la felicidad y su relación con tipos y rasgos de personalidad

Abstract: El presente estudio explora la relación entre los tipos de personalidad afectiva construidos a partir de las respuestas a las escalas PANAS de afecto positivo (PA) y afecto negativo (NA) y las dimensiones de personalidad medidas con el NEO FFI. Se obtuvieron también medidas de autoinforme de satisfacción con la vida y de bienestar subjetivo. Participaron 378 estudiantes universitarios españoles, con edades entre 18 y 36 años (media = 22.5 y DT = 2.96), siendo el 54% mujeres. Se clasificó a los participantes en… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
3
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Research should focus on the analysis and understanding of teachers from the subjective point of view, since it will allow researchers to know, understand and support teachers so that they can develop their work effectively and achieve their happiness. Morana, Fí nez and Ferná ndez (2017) affirm that high levels of happiness are associated with advantages for mental health with more adaptive dispositions and personality traits; in conclusion, satisfaction is the main indicator of well-being (Sá nchez, Garcí a, Valverde and Pé rez, 2014). Happiness is an emotional state of high satisfaction in the life of teachers when they establish friendly relationships with students (Rivera, Cruz, & Muñoz, 2011); high life satisfaction is associated with adaptive coping strategies in the learning process aimed at solving problems (Diener & Chan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Research should focus on the analysis and understanding of teachers from the subjective point of view, since it will allow researchers to know, understand and support teachers so that they can develop their work effectively and achieve their happiness. Morana, Fí nez and Ferná ndez (2017) affirm that high levels of happiness are associated with advantages for mental health with more adaptive dispositions and personality traits; in conclusion, satisfaction is the main indicator of well-being (Sá nchez, Garcí a, Valverde and Pé rez, 2014). Happiness is an emotional state of high satisfaction in the life of teachers when they establish friendly relationships with students (Rivera, Cruz, & Muñoz, 2011); high life satisfaction is associated with adaptive coping strategies in the learning process aimed at solving problems (Diener & Chan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…En esta investigación se tiene en cuenta la variable Doble presencia, en relación a la interacción trabajo-familia, como un riesgo psicosocial; y la personalidad proactiva no se mide como tal pero se podría asemejar a las variables Responsabilidad y Apertura, por lo tanto, es de importancia conocer la relación entre estas variables. Por otro lado, no existen teorías generales sobre la relación de la personalidad con el bienestar subjetivo; aunque se han relacionado los factores de Neuroticismo y Extraversión con el bienestar, el afecto positivo y negativo, y la satisfacción con la vida (Morán, Fínez, & Fernández-Abascal, 2016). Se han tenido en cuenta los cinco factores de personalidad citados.…”
Section: Relación Entre La Personalidad Los Riesgos Psicosociales Y unclassified
“…These works address issues such as the definition of these two concepts, the different ways there are to experience these states, and the evaluation of said constructs (see Diener & Oishi, 2004, 2006Diener et al, 1998;Lyubomirsky, 2008;Peterson, Park & Seligman, 2005;Peterson et al, 2007). Another important line of research it's focused on the concrete benefits of happiness, in this sense, some of the topics studied are its relationship with depression (Lomas et al, 2018), access to higher education (Nikolaev, 2018), transsexuality (Prunas et al, 2017), cross-cultural (Wang & Wong, 2014), societal welfare (Diego-Rosell et al, 2018), leisure (Newman et al, 2014), personality (Anglim & Grant, 2016;Morán et al, 2017) among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%