2013
DOI: 10.1090/s0894-0347-2013-00763-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobolev extension by linear operators

Abstract: Let L m,p (R n ) be the Sobolev space of functions with m th derivatives lying in L p (R n ). Assume that n < p < ∞. For E ⊂ R n , let L m,p (E) denote the space of restrictions to E of functions in L m,p (R n ). We show that there exists a bounded linear map T : L m,p (E) → L m,p (R n ) such that, for any f ∈ L m,p (E), we have Tf = f on E. We also give

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shvartsman has obtained in [15,16] results for the non-homogeneous Sobolev space W 1 p , both in R n and in metric spaces. In a recent paper [8], Fefferman, Israel and Luli extend Israel's result to L r p (R n ). They show that a linear extension operator can be constructed such that it has assisted bounded depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Shvartsman has obtained in [15,16] results for the non-homogeneous Sobolev space W 1 p , both in R n and in metric spaces. In a recent paper [8], Fefferman, Israel and Luli extend Israel's result to L r p (R n ). They show that a linear extension operator can be constructed such that it has assisted bounded depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Finally, we notice that the existence of a bounded linear extension operator from the trace space W m p (R n )| E into W m p (R n ) whenever E ⊂ R n is an arbitrary closed set and p > n has been proven in papers [33] (m = 1, p ∈ (n, ∞)), [20], [36] (n = 2, m = 2, p > 2), and [11] (arbitrary m, n, p > n). 7.2.…”
Section: The "Rapidly Growing" Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists Z ≥ 1 depending only on p and ǫ, such that the following holds. Assume (4). Then for any G ∈ L 2,p (R 2 ) with…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For X = C m (R n ) or C m,s (R n ) and E ⊆ R n arbitrary, there exists an extension operator whose norm depends only on m, n. Similarly, for X = L m,p (R n ) and E arbitrary, there exists an extension operator whose norm depends only on m, n, p. See [1,2,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%