2004
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-04-01708-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobolev bounds on functions with scattered zeros, with applications to radial basis function surface fitting

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we discuss Sobolev bounds on functions that vanish at scattered points in a bounded, Lipschitz domain that satisfies a uniform interior cone condition. The Sobolev spaces involved may have fractional as well as integer order. We then apply these results to obtain estimates for continuous and discrete least squares surface fits via radial basis functions (RBFs). These estimates include situations in which the target function does not belong to the native space of the RBF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…has a negative orbital derivative. Such error estimates were derived, for example in (Giesl, 2007;Giesl and Wendland, 2007), see also (Narcowich et al, 2005;Wendland, 2005).…”
Section: Mesh-free Collocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has a negative orbital derivative. Such error estimates were derived, for example in (Giesl, 2007;Giesl and Wendland, 2007), see also (Narcowich et al, 2005;Wendland, 2005).…”
Section: Mesh-free Collocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a problem of Numerical Analysis to show that certain algorithms actually produce such approximants. Standard examples are in [21,19,28,29]. Here, we are satisfied with pointing out that such approximants exist under very weak conditions.…”
Section: Overcoming Low Regularitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, if the native space is Sobolev one can instead use recent Sobolev estimates for functions with scattered zeros on R n . Specifically, one can use the following proposition, whose proof can be found in [29].…”
Section: Interpolation Error For Smooth and Rough Target Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%