2021
DOI: 10.1177/0038038520981837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sober Rebels or Good Consumer-Citizens? Anti-Consumption and the ‘Enterprising Self’ in Early Sobriety

Abstract: Former drinkers in the UK are required to negotiate sobriety in a society that positions consumption (of alcohol but also more widely) as an important part of identity formation. A refusal to consume risks positioning the self outside of the established neoliberal order, particularly as traditional models of sobriety and ‘recovery’ position the non-drinker as diseased or flawed. As drinking rates decline across western contexts and new movements celebrating sobriety as a positive ‘lifestyle choice’ proliferate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such evidence of fearing ostracism (e.g., Jack's reference to a non‐drinking housemate who ‘excluded himself’) or tactical social decision‐making (e.g., Michael and Kelly’s participation in pre‐drinking to connect socially) was significant to observe as these indicated that the norm of drinking heavily retained its force even for individuals who drank little or nothing. This dilemma links with a growing literature on the social negotiations and identity‐related challenges involved in refusing alcoholic drinks and managing favourable self‐presentation as a non‐/lighter drinker (e.g., Conroy & de Visser, 2014; Herring, Bayley, & Hurcombe, 2014; Nicholls, 2020; Piacentini & Banister, 2009). Current study data provided further evidence that lighter drinkers are under pressure to handle drinking preferences in sophisticated ways; for example, rejecting coarsely defined, stigmatized labels like ‘non‐drinker’ as all‐encompassing definitions of personal drinking preferences (see Banister et al, 2019), particularly during initial university periods when social bonds are fragile and tentative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Such evidence of fearing ostracism (e.g., Jack's reference to a non‐drinking housemate who ‘excluded himself’) or tactical social decision‐making (e.g., Michael and Kelly’s participation in pre‐drinking to connect socially) was significant to observe as these indicated that the norm of drinking heavily retained its force even for individuals who drank little or nothing. This dilemma links with a growing literature on the social negotiations and identity‐related challenges involved in refusing alcoholic drinks and managing favourable self‐presentation as a non‐/lighter drinker (e.g., Conroy & de Visser, 2014; Herring, Bayley, & Hurcombe, 2014; Nicholls, 2020; Piacentini & Banister, 2009). Current study data provided further evidence that lighter drinkers are under pressure to handle drinking preferences in sophisticated ways; for example, rejecting coarsely defined, stigmatized labels like ‘non‐drinker’ as all‐encompassing definitions of personal drinking preferences (see Banister et al, 2019), particularly during initial university periods when social bonds are fragile and tentative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It was identified that there is currently no published research regarding the current, popular social media-based sobriety communities such as Club Soda UK, Soberful, LoveSober and Sober Girl Society. While Nicholls' “Sobriety Storeys” project recruited women from a social media-based AOSG, it did not explore the relationship between social media and women's identity construction within the recovery community ( 19 , 20 ). This would be of value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Soberistas endorses a path of abstinence, it more closely aligned with popular themes of an "alcohol-free" lifestyle and selfimprovement (19,48), similar to TAIs Hello Sunday Morning (41) and Dry January (55). This ability to individually self-define, reframe and re-work traditional terms (19,20,40,41,56) is valued by participants, and reduces the stigma associated with the false binary of "addict" or "alcoholic" vs. "normal" drinker (57). These groups provided "a sense of normality for those who did not feel they belonged in the world of AA" [(40), p. 3].…”
Section: Meeting Women's Needs In Recoverymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations