1994
DOI: 10.1021/ie00029a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SO2 Removal by NH3 Gas Injection: Effects of Temperature and Moisture Content

Abstract: The removal of SO2 by NH3 gas injection at various temperatures and moisture contents has been studied experimentally. The product compositions of the NH3-SO2-HzO vapor reactions were also reported. A thermodynamic analysis was carried out to predict the SO2 removal as well as the product compositions. Both the experimental results and thermodynamic analysis indicated that SO2 removal and the product compositions are sensitive to the reaction temperature. Moisture content, once in large excess of the stoichiom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, SO 2 removal from flue gases is a goal of many air pollution engineers. Up to now, a number of new flue gas desulphurization (FGD) technologies have been applied to the removal of SO 2 , which are wet scrubbing (Meikap et al 2002;Jin et al 2006;Biswas 2007, 2008;Sarkar et al 2007), metal ion solutions (Barrie and Georgii 1967), catalytic oxidation (Pei-Shi et al 1998;Koutsopoulos et al 2006;Davenport and King 2006;Jiang et al 2008;Guo et al 2008), dry or semidry adsorption (Mangun et al 2001;Mok and Lee 2006;Liu 2007), and ammonia scrubbing (Bai et al 1994;He et al 2003). Among these, ammonia scrubbing has been successfully used to treat exhaust gases (He et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, SO 2 removal from flue gases is a goal of many air pollution engineers. Up to now, a number of new flue gas desulphurization (FGD) technologies have been applied to the removal of SO 2 , which are wet scrubbing (Meikap et al 2002;Jin et al 2006;Biswas 2007, 2008;Sarkar et al 2007), metal ion solutions (Barrie and Georgii 1967), catalytic oxidation (Pei-Shi et al 1998;Koutsopoulos et al 2006;Davenport and King 2006;Jiang et al 2008;Guo et al 2008), dry or semidry adsorption (Mangun et al 2001;Mok and Lee 2006;Liu 2007), and ammonia scrubbing (Bai et al 1994;He et al 2003). Among these, ammonia scrubbing has been successfully used to treat exhaust gases (He et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen in the flue gas may oxidize the sulfites to sulfates (Shale et al 1971;Shale 1973;Bai et al 1992Bai et al , 1994 (He et al 2003). A number of studies on the removal of SO 2 from flue gases by gaseous NH 3 injection have been conducted (Khan and Gibbs 1996;Bai et al 1994;He et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another advantage of using ammonia is the removal of hazardous NO x gases by reducing them to inert nitrogen [12,13]. This is done mainly by the process-selective noncatalyst reduction (SNCR, feedstock: ammonia or urea) or selective catalyst reduction (SCR, feedstock: ammonia).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Ammonia is superior to urea as such for SNCR in several important aspects for this application and is required for SCR applications. [4,5] *Correspondence to: B. C. Meikap, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Kharagpur, P.O. Kharagpur Technology, West Bengal, Pin-721302, India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%