2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7ra12963g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SO2 enhanced desorption from basic aluminum sulfate desulphurization–regeneration solution by falling-film evaporation

Abstract: To find the optimal structure of the converging-diverging tube and develop a high-efficiency falling-film evaporator, the heat and mass transfer performances of falling-film evaporation with convergingdiverging tubes of different dimensions were studied. The optimal converging-diverging tube was used in falling-film evaporation desorption of the basic aluminum sulfate desulphurization-regeneration solution, and different influential factors on the desorption effect were analyzed. It was found that converging-d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huang et al , experimentally investigated the desorption of BASS-SO 2 in the falling film evaporator respectively with smooth tube and converging-diverging tube. Under the conditions of heating temperature of 381.15 K, liquid flow rate of 0.005 kg/s, sulfur concentrations of 0.06 mol/L, aluminum concentration of 20 g/L, and basity of 20%, the converging-diverging tube (desorption efficiency 94.2%) performed better in the desorption efficiency than the smooth tube (desorption efficiency 83.7%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang et al , experimentally investigated the desorption of BASS-SO 2 in the falling film evaporator respectively with smooth tube and converging-diverging tube. Under the conditions of heating temperature of 381.15 K, liquid flow rate of 0.005 kg/s, sulfur concentrations of 0.06 mol/L, aluminum concentration of 20 g/L, and basity of 20%, the converging-diverging tube (desorption efficiency 94.2%) performed better in the desorption efficiency than the smooth tube (desorption efficiency 83.7%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%