So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams

Abstract

SummaryGeographically dispersed teams whose members do not allocate all of their time to a single team increasingly carry out knowledge-intensive work in multinational organizations. Taking an attention-based view of team design, we investigate the antecedents and consequences of member time allocation in a multi-level study of 2055 members of 285 teams in a large global corporation, using member survey data and independent executive ratings of team performance. We focus on two distinct dimensions of time allocation: the proportion of members' time that is allocated to the focal team and the number of other teams to which the members allocate time concurrently.At the individual level, we find that time allocation is influenced by members' levels of experience, rank, education, and leader role on the team, as predicted. At the team level, performance is higher for teams whose members allocate a greater proportion of their time to the focal team, but surprisingly, performance is also higher for teams whose members allocate time to a greater number of other teams concurrently. Furthermore, the effects of member time allocation on team performance are contingent on geographic dispersion: the advantages of allocating more time to the focal team are greater for more dispersed teams, whereas the advantages of allocating time to more other teams are greater for less dispersed teams. We discuss the implications for future research on new forms of teams as well as managerial practice, including how to manage geographically dispersed teams with the effects of member time allocation in mind.

Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work

“…Additionally, geographically dispersed work teams can activate "faultlines" (hypothetical dividing lines that split a group into subgroups) and impair group functioning (Polzer et al 2006), especially when there are geographically dispersed subgroups (multiple people at different sites) (O'Leary & Mortensen 2010). Global virtual team effectiveness can be enhanced through various strategies, such as limiting the number of teams that workers are part of, developing cultural sensitivity, and increasing comfort with communication technologies (Cummings & Haas 2012, Maynard et al 2012, MacDuffie 2007). …”

Deep Help in Complex Project Work: Guiding and Path-Clearing Across Difficult Terrain

“…First, it highlights the role of temporal rhythm-the duration and pattern of interactions-in shaping the two deep-helping processes. Building on the view that time and attention are finite organizational resources (e.g., Cummings and Haas, 2012;March and Simon, 1958), we argue that adoption of a deep-helping rhythm is a critical resource-allocation decision that transcends the potential giver's decision about whether to help. For givers, the decision to engage is not merely a question of whether to help; it is a nuanced calculation about how much time and attention to allocate.…”

Organization Theory and the Changing Nature of Science

“…Managing time and attention across multiple teams, especially when members are in different geographic locations, can make working in teams challenging (Cummings & Haas, 2012). Social media websites such as GitHub are starting to make working on multiple projects easier (Tsay, Dabbish, & Herbsleb, 2012).…”