The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

So many factors, so little time…Simulation experiments in the frequency domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [39], many studies in operational research use full factorial design due to its simplicity and because the technique allows the analyst to identify interactions between factors as well as their main effects.…”
Section: Full Factorial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [39], many studies in operational research use full factorial design due to its simplicity and because the technique allows the analyst to identify interactions between factors as well as their main effects.…”
Section: Full Factorial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decide on the importance of the coefficients, one can use a graph of the SNR versus p that shows a spike for each important term at its term indicator frequencies (Sanchez et al, 2006). A formal analysis is also possible.…”
Section: Model Structure and Test Statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the fact that while the FDM method is able to screen the main effects, the interaction effects, the quadratic effects, etc., none of the other methods, except the factorial analysis, is able to do this. Sanchez et al (2006) also showed that FDM needs less data while it can screen factors as accurate as factorial experiments but it should be mention that FDM has been introduced only for discrete-event simulation models which is our focus in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations