1922
DOI: 10.2307/789371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

So-Called "De Facto" Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1939
1939
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1921 article, 'So-Called "De Facto" Recognition', contended that the distinction between simple and de facto recognition (that is, of a belligerent) rests on a misapprehension. 374 Here, Baty introduces a concept of recognition that, consistent with his focus on canonical principles, barely relies on any appeal to what states do or have done, or criteria of statehood. If an area is under an authority that is factually obeyed, and that is not threatened by any other would-be sovereigns, then 'that district is a state, and the authority is its sovereign'.…”
Section: B Baty: Recognition In Service Of Canon-respecting Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1921 article, 'So-Called "De Facto" Recognition', contended that the distinction between simple and de facto recognition (that is, of a belligerent) rests on a misapprehension. 374 Here, Baty introduces a concept of recognition that, consistent with his focus on canonical principles, barely relies on any appeal to what states do or have done, or criteria of statehood. If an area is under an authority that is factually obeyed, and that is not threatened by any other would-be sovereigns, then 'that district is a state, and the authority is its sovereign'.…”
Section: B Baty: Recognition In Service Of Canon-respecting Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%