2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2011.6095179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SO(2) and SO(3), omni-directional personal mobility with link-driven spherical wheels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these wheels have the disadvantages such as low load capacity due to their complicated structure, unavoidable vertical vibration due to discontinuous ground contact, and inability to travel over tall obstacles due to the small radius of the rollers (Ferrière et al, 1996). As another example, omnidirectional mobile robots using spherical wheels have been proposed (Kumagai and Ochiai 2010;Ok et al, 2011;Ostrovskaya et al, 2000;Singh et al, 2017;Wada and Asada, 1999;West and Asada, 1995). They also realize superb mobility but have problems in that the drive mechanisms tend to be complicated and the wheel radii become small despite their large volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these wheels have the disadvantages such as low load capacity due to their complicated structure, unavoidable vertical vibration due to discontinuous ground contact, and inability to travel over tall obstacles due to the small radius of the rollers (Ferrière et al, 1996). As another example, omnidirectional mobile robots using spherical wheels have been proposed (Kumagai and Ochiai 2010;Ok et al, 2011;Ostrovskaya et al, 2000;Singh et al, 2017;Wada and Asada, 1999;West and Asada, 1995). They also realize superb mobility but have problems in that the drive mechanisms tend to be complicated and the wheel radii become small despite their large volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%