2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8nr04661a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SnS2/TiO2 nanohybrids chemically bonded on nitrogen-doped graphene for lithium–sulfur batteries: synergy of vacancy defects and heterostructures

Abstract: Despite their high-energy density, low cost and environmental friendliness, the commercial application of lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) has been plagued by their severe capacity decay during long-term cycling caused by polysulfide shuttling. Herein, we demonstrate a synergetic vacancy and heterostructure engineering strategy using a nitrogen-doped graphene/SnS2/TiO2 (denoted as NG/SnS2/TiO2) nanocomposite to enhance the electrochemical performance of LSBs. It is noted that plentiful sulfur vacancy (Vs) defec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, commercialization of LSBs has been impeded by low S utilization, a consequence of the shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides, along with fast capacity decay and low electron conductivity of S/Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S, huge volume variation of active S upon lithiation, and corrosion of Li anodes [4][5][6][7]. In recent years, various strategies have been adopted to weaken the influence of the above issues and improve the electrochemical performance of LSBs, including modification of the separator [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the creation of new electrolytes [15][16][17][18], the addition of protection for the Li anode [19][20][21], and improvement of the sulfur host [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Among these, the creation of a novel sulfur host is a promising tactic to promote sulfur utilization and buffer volume expansion in the cathode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, commercialization of LSBs has been impeded by low S utilization, a consequence of the shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides, along with fast capacity decay and low electron conductivity of S/Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S, huge volume variation of active S upon lithiation, and corrosion of Li anodes [4][5][6][7]. In recent years, various strategies have been adopted to weaken the influence of the above issues and improve the electrochemical performance of LSBs, including modification of the separator [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the creation of new electrolytes [15][16][17][18], the addition of protection for the Li anode [19][20][21], and improvement of the sulfur host [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Among these, the creation of a novel sulfur host is a promising tactic to promote sulfur utilization and buffer volume expansion in the cathode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Moreover,B oth W 2 C@CNFs and CNFs show two typical bands about 1356 cm À1 (D band) and 1589 cm À1 (G band), which are attributed to the disordered carbon and ordered graphite, respectively.Ahigher I D /I G (1.11) of W 2 C@CNFst han CNFs (1.01) indicates the increased defect density within the W 2 Ci mpregnated in the CNFs, in which the defective disordering structure is beneficialf or LiPSs anchoring. [17] XPS analysisf urther confirms the chemical composition of W 2 C@CNFs( Figure S5). The typical IV curve is shown in sorption isothermi nF igureS6a, where the hysteresis loop suggests the mesoporous structure of W 2 C@CNFs with specific surface area of 16 m 2 g À1 based on the BET method.A ss hown in Figure S6 b, the pore size of W 2 C@CNFsi sm ainly distributed from 8 % 20 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, Both W 2 C@CNFs and CNFs show two typical bands about 1356 cm −1 (D band) and 1589 cm −1 (G band), which are attributed to the disordered carbon and ordered graphite, respectively. A higher I D / I G (1.11) of W 2 C@CNFs than CNFs (1.01) indicates the increased defect density within the W 2 C impregnated in the CNFs, in which the defective disordering structure is beneficial for LiPSs anchoring [17] . XPS analysis further confirms the chemical composition of W 2 C@CNFs (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The Ti 3+ states participating in these compounds can be the origin of 463 eV peak. The other peak with a binding energy of 466.4 eV can be attributed to the presence of Ti-C bonding on the sample 61 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%