Diagnostics in Plant Breeding 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-5687-8_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNP Genotyping Technologies

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly applied marker types changed from hybridization-based markers analysed by gel electrophoresis in the 1980s to PCR-based markers analysed initially by gel electrophoresis and later by fluorescence detection in the 1990s up to more sophisticated highly parallel multi-enzyme-and multi-fluorescence detection-based genotypingby-hybridization and GBS approaches in the last decade (Table 16.2, for details on marker technologies applied to B. napus also see reviews in Gail and Sharpe, 2012;Studer and Kölliker, 2013;Mir et al, 2014). Commonly applied marker types changed from hybridization-based markers analysed by gel electrophoresis in the 1980s to PCR-based markers analysed initially by gel electrophoresis and later by fluorescence detection in the 1990s up to more sophisticated highly parallel multi-enzyme-and multi-fluorescence detection-based genotypingby-hybridization and GBS approaches in the last decade (Table 16.2, for details on marker technologies applied to B. napus also see reviews in Gail and Sharpe, 2012;Studer and Kölliker, 2013;Mir et al, 2014).…”
Section: Molecular Marker Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Commonly applied marker types changed from hybridization-based markers analysed by gel electrophoresis in the 1980s to PCR-based markers analysed initially by gel electrophoresis and later by fluorescence detection in the 1990s up to more sophisticated highly parallel multi-enzyme-and multi-fluorescence detection-based genotypingby-hybridization and GBS approaches in the last decade (Table 16.2, for details on marker technologies applied to B. napus also see reviews in Gail and Sharpe, 2012;Studer and Kölliker, 2013;Mir et al, 2014). Commonly applied marker types changed from hybridization-based markers analysed by gel electrophoresis in the 1980s to PCR-based markers analysed initially by gel electrophoresis and later by fluorescence detection in the 1990s up to more sophisticated highly parallel multi-enzyme-and multi-fluorescence detection-based genotypingby-hybridization and GBS approaches in the last decade (Table 16.2, for details on marker technologies applied to B. napus also see reviews in Gail and Sharpe, 2012;Studer and Kölliker, 2013;Mir et al, 2014).…”
Section: Molecular Marker Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In commercial breeding, SSR markers are up to this day still commonly used in many genotyping applications including MAS in B. napus (Table 16.6). HRM can be used for genotyping of SNPs and other polymorphisms (Studer and Kölliker, 2013). HRM can be used for genotyping of SNPs and other polymorphisms (Studer and Kölliker, 2013).…”
Section: The Forefathers Of Marker Technology: Hybridizationand Pcr-bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations