2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNP Calling, Genotype Calling, and Sample Allele Frequency Estimation from New-Generation Sequencing Data

Abstract: We present a statistical framework for estimation and application of sample allele frequency spectra from New-Generation Sequencing (NGS) data. In this method, we first estimate the allele frequency spectrum using maximum likelihood. In contrast to previous methods, the likelihood function is calculated using a dynamic programming algorithm and numerically optimized using analytical derivatives. We then use a Bayesian method for estimating the sample allele frequency in a single site, and show how the method c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
457
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
457
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, the probabilistic method performs overall better than using called genotypes. However, the difference between using called genotypes and the probabilistic approach is much smaller here than observed in other studies (Kim et al 2011;Nielsen et al 2012), because only true SNPs are included in these simulations, alleviating the problem of an excess of false singletons (and to a lesser degree doubletons) in methods based on genotype calling.…”
Section: Effect Of Inbreeding On Sfsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Not surprisingly, the probabilistic method performs overall better than using called genotypes. However, the difference between using called genotypes and the probabilistic approach is much smaller here than observed in other studies (Kim et al 2011;Nielsen et al 2012), because only true SNPs are included in these simulations, alleviating the problem of an excess of false singletons (and to a lesser degree doubletons) in methods based on genotype calling.…”
Section: Effect Of Inbreeding On Sfsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We used both the standard approach based on called genotypes (see Methods) and a recent probabilistic method by Nielsen et al (2012). High inbreeding coefficients have a marked effect on SFS estimation, and can increase the RMSD in the estimate of the SFS many fold ( Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Inbreeding On Sfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A growing number of next-generation sequencing projects produce low coverage data that cannot be used to unambiguously assign individual genotypes, but which can be analyzed probabilistically to account for uncertainty in individual genotypes [82][83][84]. However, most existing LAI methods require genotype data derived from diploid individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%