2003
DOI: 10.1139/g03-073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNP-based codominant markers for a recessive gene conferring resistance to corky root rot (Rhizomonas suberifaciens) in lettuce (Lactuca sativa)

Abstract: The analysis of F2 progeny and derived F3 families of Lactuca sativa segregating for resistance to corky root rot caused by Rhizomonas suberifaciens permitted the identification of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers linked to the recessive resistance gene cor. PCR-based markers were identified by bulked segregant analysis (BSA). Allele-specific primers were generally designed with the 3 terminal base coinciding with an SNP, matching one of the allel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gro1 -specific marker was not correlated with the resistance phenotype, while H1 -specific marker was indicative of resistance in only four cultivars [46]. A similar example can be shown for lettuce, where markers most tightly linked to the cor resistance gene were the least useful for diagnostic when tested in a large collection of cultivars [47]. There are several other examples of markers tightly linked to resistance genes, but whose use present problems in material different from the original in which they were identified [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Gro1 -specific marker was not correlated with the resistance phenotype, while H1 -specific marker was indicative of resistance in only four cultivars [46]. A similar example can be shown for lettuce, where markers most tightly linked to the cor resistance gene were the least useful for diagnostic when tested in a large collection of cultivars [47]. There are several other examples of markers tightly linked to resistance genes, but whose use present problems in material different from the original in which they were identified [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is a simple, low cost, and highly reproducible marker system which can be developed on the basis of single or a few nucleotide changes. It has been applied in, e.g., Arabidopsis (Drenkard et al 2000), soybean (Jeong and Maroof 2004;Kim et al 2005;Yuan et al 2007), apple (Gao et al 2005), maize (Shin et al 2006), rice (Hayashi et al 2004(Hayashi et al , 2006 and lettuce (Moreno-Vázquez et al 2003). For each SNP locus, two allele-specific forward (or reverse) primers (each matching one of the SNPvariants at the 3 0 -end) and two normal reverse (or forward) primers with matching melting temperatures were designed (Fig.…”
Section: Snp Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we detected a 186 bp insertion (Ls268, GenBank AY207405.1 and AY207406.1) in lettuce that we used to design a codominant marker (SC268) for the recessive resistance gene cor (Moreno-Va´zquez et al, 2003). This fragment was present in most resistant genotypes (represented by the cultivar Green Lake) and absent in most susceptible genotypes (represented by the cultivar Diana).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA extraction procedure, primer sequences, PCR conditions, cloning and other molecular procedures were described in Moreno-Va´zquez et al (2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%