1975
DOI: 10.2307/3800236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snowshoe Hare Mortality Monitored by Telemetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We reject a reviewer's suggestion that coyotes were simply scavenging animals that had starved to death during November and December for the following reasons: (i) coyotes have never scavenged hare carcasses set out by us, e.g . , 10 during the winter of 1972-1973 in Alberta (Brand et al 1975), nor 25 set out during the winter of 1991 -1992 in Manitoba (D. Murray, personal communication), although coyotes were abundant in both areas; (ii) femur-marrow fat levels were 24 and 50% in the two cottontails whose carcass remains permitted such analyses. Snowshoe and arctic (Lepus arcticus) hares that starved to death in the wild have had marrow-fat levels averaging 16 % (range 13 -19 % , n = 7) and 10 % (range 6 -16 % , n = 8), respectively (Keith et al 1984;Barta et al 1989).…”
Section: Proximate Causes Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We reject a reviewer's suggestion that coyotes were simply scavenging animals that had starved to death during November and December for the following reasons: (i) coyotes have never scavenged hare carcasses set out by us, e.g . , 10 during the winter of 1972-1973 in Alberta (Brand et al 1975), nor 25 set out during the winter of 1991 -1992 in Manitoba (D. Murray, personal communication), although coyotes were abundant in both areas; (ii) femur-marrow fat levels were 24 and 50% in the two cottontails whose carcass remains permitted such analyses. Snowshoe and arctic (Lepus arcticus) hares that starved to death in the wild have had marrow-fat levels averaging 16 % (range 13 -19 % , n = 7) and 10 % (range 6 -16 % , n = 8), respectively (Keith et al 1984;Barta et al 1989).…”
Section: Proximate Causes Of Deathmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results suggest that lower survival is, at best, only weakly involved in determining regional population dynamics. Moreover, I summarized the small sample of studies that evaluated, via radiotelemetry, proximate cause of mortality and survival in hares; I found that for cyclic populations (n = 4) in Alberta, Yukon, and Manitoba (Brand et al 1975;Keith et al 1984;Boutin et al 1986;Murray et al 1997 Note: Data from most studies were obtained from mark-recapture studies and compiled by Keith (1990). Estimates for adults refer to yearly survival, whereas those for juveniles represent summer to spring values.…”
Section: Snowshoe Hare Distribution and Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to predation, the available evidence suggests that it is the most important proximate source of hare mortality during the period of population decline (Brand et al 1975, Boutin et al 1986, Trostel et al 1987). What is less certain is the role of predation in arresting hare population growth during the cycle's increase phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%