2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0459.2011.00440.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snowpack characteristics of vestfonna and de geerfonna (nordaustlandet, svalbard) – a spatiotemporal analysis based on multiyear snow‐pit data

Abstract: Extensive glaciological field measurements were carried out on the ice cap Vestfonna as well as on the minor ice body De Geerfonna (Nordaustlandet, Svalbard) within the framework of IPY Kinnvika. Field campaigns were conducted during the period 2007-2010 in spring (April/May) and summer (August). In this study we compile and present snow cover information obtained from 22 snow pits that were dug on Vestfonna during this period. Locations are along two transects on the northwestern, land terminating slope of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The elevation across the summit ridge appears not to be significantly changing (Pohjola et al 2011); hence the spatial and temporal accumulation trend may also result from outflow glacier dynamics, such as observed for Franklinbreen (Pohjola et al 2011). This finding is seemingly not supported by the spatio-temporal snow-pit analysis of Möller et al (2011b) that did not reveal statistically significant zonal variability of snow accumulation across the ice cap. However, to explain that discrepancy between our ice core study and their snow pits analysis Möller et al (2011b) also invoked a spatial difference in the magnitude of the small-scale accumulation variability due to patchy deposition of wind-drift snow.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Variability Of Snow Accumulation Rates contrasting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The elevation across the summit ridge appears not to be significantly changing (Pohjola et al 2011); hence the spatial and temporal accumulation trend may also result from outflow glacier dynamics, such as observed for Franklinbreen (Pohjola et al 2011). This finding is seemingly not supported by the spatio-temporal snow-pit analysis of Möller et al (2011b) that did not reveal statistically significant zonal variability of snow accumulation across the ice cap. However, to explain that discrepancy between our ice core study and their snow pits analysis Möller et al (2011b) also invoked a spatial difference in the magnitude of the small-scale accumulation variability due to patchy deposition of wind-drift snow.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Variability Of Snow Accumulation Rates contrasting
confidence: 70%
“…This finding is seemingly not supported by the spatio-temporal snow-pit analysis of Möller et al (2011b) that did not reveal statistically significant zonal variability of snow accumulation across the ice cap. However, to explain that discrepancy between our ice core study and their snow pits analysis Möller et al (2011b) also invoked a spatial difference in the magnitude of the small-scale accumulation variability due to patchy deposition of wind-drift snow. Möller et al (2011b) present a more detailed discussion of this topic.…”
Section: Spatial and Temporal Variability Of Snow Accumulation Rates contrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting value corresponds to 346 ± 45 kg m -3 , lower than the value of the snow overlying the glacier measured in the Vestfonna area (388 ± 45 kg m -3 in Moller et al 2011) or to the value generically determined for Spitsbergen (375 kg m -3 ) by Sand et al (2003). The average density value obtained in this study is influenced by ''high'' number of profiles with seasonal snow in the data set.…”
Section: Snowpack Density (U)mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Seasonal snow profiles data collected on Vestfonna ice cap as well as on the minor ice body of DeGeerfonna were analysed regarding density, hardness and temperature distribution within the snowpack (Moller et al 2011;Sauter et al 2013). This dataset allows to derive interannual variability of the snowpack, the amounts of snow accumulation across the two studied areas as well as the distribution of Snow Water Equivalent (SWE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%