2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000gl011641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snow grain size retrieved from near‐infrared radiances at multiple wavelengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average grain size was observed 161 and 187 µm for this study area, and 183 and 216 µm at station-2 using wavelengths 1240 and 1050 nm, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). The larger grain size retrieved using wavelength 1050 nm compared to 1240 nm can be explained by the fact that the retrieved grain size depends on radiation penetration depth, which is wavelength dependent (Bourdelles and Fily, 1993;Li et al, 2001). The vertical homogeneity of snowpack can also be defined by the ratio of retrieved grain size at the 1050 nm to the 1240 nm wavelength channels, and we found this ratio 1.29 at the station-1 and 1.18 at station-2.…”
Section: Albedomentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average grain size was observed 161 and 187 µm for this study area, and 183 and 216 µm at station-2 using wavelengths 1240 and 1050 nm, respectively (Tables 3 and 4). The larger grain size retrieved using wavelength 1050 nm compared to 1240 nm can be explained by the fact that the retrieved grain size depends on radiation penetration depth, which is wavelength dependent (Bourdelles and Fily, 1993;Li et al, 2001). The vertical homogeneity of snowpack can also be defined by the ratio of retrieved grain size at the 1050 nm to the 1240 nm wavelength channels, and we found this ratio 1.29 at the station-1 and 1.18 at station-2.…”
Section: Albedomentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Nolin and Dozier (2000) further made a hyperspectral method for snow grain size retrieval using imaging spectrometer AVIRIS data, which integrates across the entire 1.03 µm absorption feature, which is scaled spectrally by its continuum. Li et al (2001) retrieved snow grain size from near-infrared radiances at multiple wavelengths 0.86, 1.05, 1.24 and 1.73 µm from AVIRIS and found the retrieved snow grain size depend on wavelength. Painter et al (2003) estimated and validated the subpixel snow cover and snow grain size using AVIRIS data.…”
Section: Remote Sensing Of Snow Grain Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the simple approach outlined in the previous section, we obtained effective diameters equal to 152, 182 and 144 µm for the Grand Mesa, Lake Granby and Derby Peak scene, respectively, when using the RSP band at 2264 nm. Using instead the 1594 nm channel, diameters typically 30 µm smaller are obtained for each scene, which can be explained by the different penetration depths of the two channels, indicating crystal size increasing with depth as expected Li et al, 2001;Aoki et al, 2000;Warren, 1982). These values, at the lower end of common retrieval ranges, are normally associated with fresh snow conditions as found in studies based on other remote sensors in alpine regions (Negi and Kokhanovsky, 2011;Painter et al, 2009;Dozier and Painter, 2004;Nolin and Dozier, 2000) and polar plateaus (Lyapustin et al, 2009;Hori et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For conditions equivalent to those found in snowpacks, Bi et al (2014) showed that the errors in retrieved effective radius attributable to the use of the conventional geometric optics approach are below 5 %. Another important aspect to consider is that the 1594 and 2264 nm channels experience different penetration depths, with the former weighted more towards the top layer, while the latter probes deeper into the medium; as a consequence, the retrieved sizes contain information on the vertical structure of the snowpack Li et al, 2001;Warren, 1982).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former (BT11) can be used as a direct indicator of the thermal condition of snow cover, whereas the latter (Ref1.6) varies depending on snow grain size at the top surface and thus the variation of Ref1.6 can be interpreted as the change of surface snow type. In addition, the penetration depth of light at 1.6 m is within a depth of 1 cm (Li et al, 2001) which is shallower than those at shorter wavelengths and close to the skin depth of TIR radiation. Thus, Ref1.6 was used in this study to assess the change of surface snow type and compared with TIR emissive behaviors of snow cover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%