2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Snorkel’ lice barrier technology reduced two co- occurring parasites, the salmon louse ( Lepeophtheirus salmonis ) and the amoebic gill disease causing agent ( Neoparamoeba perurans ), in commercial salmon sea-cages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
33
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Salmon likely entered the enclosure as it was the only place within the snorkel cage that they could reach the surface and refill their open swim bladder by swallowing air at the surface for buoyancy control (Dempster et al., ). Use of the freshwater surface layer coincided with reductions in amoebic gill disease levels (Wright, Stien, et al., ), which suggest that fish were utilizing the layer for >3 min daily exposures for swim bladder reinflation and due to other motivational factors (Oppedal et al., ) or that daily exposures of ≤3 min were over longer periods than the current trial. This commercial example may open the way for implementation of similar strategies for other AGD‐affected marine fish species where freshwater exposures are practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Salmon likely entered the enclosure as it was the only place within the snorkel cage that they could reach the surface and refill their open swim bladder by swallowing air at the surface for buoyancy control (Dempster et al., ). Use of the freshwater surface layer coincided with reductions in amoebic gill disease levels (Wright, Stien, et al., ), which suggest that fish were utilizing the layer for >3 min daily exposures for swim bladder reinflation and due to other motivational factors (Oppedal et al., ) or that daily exposures of ≤3 min were over longer periods than the current trial. This commercial example may open the way for implementation of similar strategies for other AGD‐affected marine fish species where freshwater exposures are practical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…While repeated exposures are difficult to achieve using traditional bathing practices such as a tarpaulin lined cage or well boat, they are possible with recently developed in situ bathing methods. A freshwater layer within a surface enclosure in a “snorkel” cage reduced an outbreak of amoebic gill disease in commercial sea‐cages for Atlantic salmon in Norway (Wright, Stien, et al., ). Salmon likely entered the enclosure as it was the only place within the snorkel cage that they could reach the surface and refill their open swim bladder by swallowing air at the surface for buoyancy control (Dempster et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Commercial-scale snorkels at present are 90 m in circumference and 10 m deep within sea-cages 160 m in circumference and 30-50 m deep. 60 At these scales, current flow and oxygen flux will likely differ from our trial results, and therefore full commercial-scale testing of the technology in different production environments is essential to determine the practical implications of operating these cages.…”
Section: Snorkel Environment and Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%