Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Antecedentes: El ronquido es un ruido molesto que afecta la convivencia, la salud y la calidad de vida de quien lo padece y de los que están en su entorno. Existen alternativas de tratamiento que de forma individual pueden mejorar la situación del paciente pero que muchas veces no resuelven por completo el problema. Surge entonces la posibilidad de combinar dos o más alternativas para poder tratar de forma eficaz el ronquido. Objetivo: Describir la evidencia existente sobre el uso del tratamiento laser de foto-estimulación Nightlase y de los Dispositivos de Avance Mandibular (DAM) para tratar los ronquidos, y de la sinergia positiva que supone utilizarlos de forma conjunta. Métodos: Este estudio consistió en una revisión narrativa de la literatura. La búsqueda se realizó por PubMed con palabras clave y se seleccionaron los artículos publicados a partir de 2010 Resultados: La combinación de ambos enfoques ofrece sinergias en el tratamiento del ronquido. Los DAM actúan físicamente para ampliar el espacio de las vías respiratorias, mientras que la terapia láser de fotoestimulación trabaja a nivel celular para mejorar la resistencia y la tonicidad de los tejidos afectados. Conclusiones: El tratamiento combinado del ronquido con dispositivo y laser aborda el problema del ronquido con dos enfoques diferentes que combinados pueden ser una opción prometedora.
Antecedentes: El ronquido es un ruido molesto que afecta la convivencia, la salud y la calidad de vida de quien lo padece y de los que están en su entorno. Existen alternativas de tratamiento que de forma individual pueden mejorar la situación del paciente pero que muchas veces no resuelven por completo el problema. Surge entonces la posibilidad de combinar dos o más alternativas para poder tratar de forma eficaz el ronquido. Objetivo: Describir la evidencia existente sobre el uso del tratamiento laser de foto-estimulación Nightlase y de los Dispositivos de Avance Mandibular (DAM) para tratar los ronquidos, y de la sinergia positiva que supone utilizarlos de forma conjunta. Métodos: Este estudio consistió en una revisión narrativa de la literatura. La búsqueda se realizó por PubMed con palabras clave y se seleccionaron los artículos publicados a partir de 2010 Resultados: La combinación de ambos enfoques ofrece sinergias en el tratamiento del ronquido. Los DAM actúan físicamente para ampliar el espacio de las vías respiratorias, mientras que la terapia láser de fotoestimulación trabaja a nivel celular para mejorar la resistencia y la tonicidad de los tejidos afectados. Conclusiones: El tratamiento combinado del ronquido con dispositivo y laser aborda el problema del ronquido con dos enfoques diferentes que combinados pueden ser una opción prometedora.
BACKGROUND Previous studies have linked sleep quality to temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), suggesting a role for snoring in this association. However, the directionality of this relationship remains a subject of debate. This investigation aimed to elucidate the connections between snoring and TMD. Methods: This research employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, leveraging publicly available large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on snoring and TMD. We utilized a suite of analytical methods, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, maximum likelihood estimation, adjusted profile score, weighted median, MR‒Egger regression, and a series of sensitivity analyses, to rigorously assess the existence of relationships. Results: Our findings indicate that a greater genetic predisposition to snoring is significantly associated with a reduced risk of TMD (IVW method; odds ratio [OR] = 0.156, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.028 to 0.843, p = 0.0309). Conversely, the analysis did not support a potential influence of TMD on snoring susceptibility (IVW method; 95% CI = 0.990 to 1.002, p = 0.1926). Additionally, our sensitivity analyses did not reveal any significant pleiotropy that could bias these findings. Conclusion: This MR study provides preliminary but novel genetic evidence supporting a potential causal link between snoring and a decreased risk of developing TMD. On the other hand, it does not substantiate a effect of TMD on the likelihood of snoring. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to employ a MR analytical framework to investigate the impact of snoring on TMD. This approach aims to provide complementary information to that obtained from RCTs, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between snoring and TMD. METHODS Mendelian randomization methods.Genetically predicted.Genetic associations with temporomandibular joint disorders. RESULTS First, a total of 38 SNPs predicting snoring at genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) were obtained in the published GWAS, but 35 SNPs were used to assess the association with TMD after merging with the outcome dataset. Then, 7 SNPs that were palindromic with intermediate allele frequencies were removed via the "harmonize_data" tool. Next, we excluded 5 SNPs with a single F-statistic < 10 or linked to phenotypes related to potential confounding factors. The PhenoScanner database was queried to examine phenotypes associated with each genetic variant. Variants linked to phenotypes related to potential confounding factors, such as OSA, pain, smoking, or psychosocial conditions, were excluded based on PhenoScanner[64]. Finally, 23 SNPs (F ranging from 15.730 to 1070.37) were selected for subsequent MR analysis. The information gathered for the SNPs for snoring used in the current study is summarized in Supporting Information Table S1, mainly including effect alleles, other alleles and summary statistics. Fig. 2 summarizes the results in the flow chart. The relationships between snoring and TMD were investigated independently using IVW, MR‒Egger, Weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode approaches. Table 1 and Fig. 3 show that statistical significance was observed in the IVW analysis [odds ratio (OR) = 0.156, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.028 to 0.843, p = 0.0309]. A forest plot showing the effects of snoring on TMD is shown in Fig. 4. No significant effects were detected in the MR‒Egger (OR = 0.210, 95% CI = 0.038 to 1.649, p = 0.7266), WM (OR = 0.091, 95% CI = 0.0074 to 1.129, p = 0.0506), weighted mode (OR = 0.017, 95% CI = 0.065 to 4.696, p = 0.1703) or simple mode (OR = 0.028, 95% CI = 0.0138 to 6.000, p = 0.2063) analyses. What’s more, a high statistical power (90%) was identified in our study analyzed in mRnd (https://shiny.cnsgenomics.com/mRnd/)[60]. CONCLUSIONS The study utilized MR to explore the relationship between snoring and TMD, finding that a genetic predisposition to snoring may reduce the risk of TMD. No link was found in the opposite direction. It hypothesized that snoring could have a protective effect on TMD through several possible mechanisms like intermittent hypoxia and vibratory disruption of pain signals, offering a new perspective on their association.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.