2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-003-0891-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snipping polymorphisms from large EST collections in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Abstract: The public EST (expressed sequence tag) databases represent an enormous but heterogeneous repository of sequences, including many from a broad selection of plant species and a wide range of distinct varieties. The significant redundancy within large EST collections makes them an attractive resource for rapid pre-selection of candidate sequence polymorphisms. Here we present a strategy that allows rapid identification of candidate SNPs in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) using publicly available EST databases. Analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The barley amplicons were of mean size 300-450 bp. All PCR procedures followed those described elsewhere (Kota et al 2001(Kota et al , 2003.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barley amplicons were of mean size 300-450 bp. All PCR procedures followed those described elsewhere (Kota et al 2001(Kota et al , 2003.…”
Section: Plant Materials and Pcrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in barley, a total of 3069 candidate SNPs were obtained from the analysis of detection algorithm (SNiPpER) in 8171 EST sequences (0.37 SNP per sequence; Kota et al, 2003). In Lycopersicon esculentum, it was possible to obtain 101 potential SNPs from 1245 contigs, using in silico detection (0.08 SNP per sequence; Yang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Continued On Next Pagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid identification and verification of SNP markers using EST data sources is advantageous in leading to high-volume, cost-effective SNP discovery in plants ( Kota et al, 2003;Pavy et al, 2006;Varshney et al, 2007). One of the main advantages is that markers within or closely associated with coding regions can be identified (Picoult-Newberg et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%