2015
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/041
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNIa detection in the SNLS photometric analysis using Morphological Component Analysis

Abstract: Detection of supernovae (SNe) and, more generally, of transient events in large surveys can provide numerous false detections. In the case of a deferred processing of survey images, this implies reconstructing complete light curves for all detections, requiring sizable processing time and resources. Optimizing the detection of transient events is thus an important issue for both present and future surveys. We present here the optimization done in the SuperNova Legacy Survey (SNLS) for the 5-year data deferred … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full details can be found in Starck et al (2010). This method has been used to extract filamentary clouds in Herschel data (André et al 2010) or, more recently, to improve SNIa detection in the SuperNova Legacy Survey data set (Möller et al 2015).…”
Section: Separation Using a Sparsity Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details can be found in Starck et al (2010). This method has been used to extract filamentary clouds in Herschel data (André et al 2010) or, more recently, to improve SNIa detection in the SuperNova Legacy Survey data set (Möller et al 2015).…”
Section: Separation Using a Sparsity Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is prone to numerical errors and produces noticeable artifacts around bright stars and the central regions of bright galaxies, the Alard & Lupton (1998) method serves as the foundation upon which several successful transient survey programs have been built (e.g., Price & Magnier 2019;Bellm et al 2018). In addition to the image subtraction algorithm, data-driven approaches such as random forest algorithm (e.g., Goldstein et al 2015), morphological component analysis (Möller et al 2015) and deep neural networks (e.g., Cabrera-Vives et al 2016;Cabrera-Vives et al 2017;Reyes et al 2018;du Buisson et al 2015;Morii et al 2016), have been introduced to alleviate the workload of human-scanners for identification of potential transients. Sedaghat & Mahabal (2018) recently suggested the use of deep learning neural networks instead of PSF-matching for image differencing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%