“…By a general demonstration independent of the underlying model for the DE, we show in this article a contradiction (except in de Sitter) between the first law introduced in [7,8] for the thermo-horizon that leads to · −E = · R A , and the definition of the total energy in the horizon E = R A 2 . To solve this contradiction, we propose to replace the first law by a Gibbs' equation for the DE component, which is naturally associated to the e.h. in the model [4,5], later supported by an holographic model [6] in an independent approach.…”