2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.08188
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNEWPY: A Data Pipeline from Supernova Simulations to Neutrino Signals

Abstract: Current neutrino detectors will observe hundreds to thousands of neutrinos from a Galactic supernovae, and future detectors will increase this yield by an order of magnitude or more. With such a data set comes the potential for a huge increase in our understanding of the explosions of massive stars, nuclear physics under extreme conditions, and the properties of the neutrino. However, there is currently a large gap between

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, we extract from the Monte Carlo data, in 0.1 ms time bins, the luminosity, average energy, and root mean squared energy for each neutrino species in a 30 ms time window around black hole formation, starting ∼7 ms before and continuing ∼23 ms after black hole formation. With these quantities, we use SNEWPY (Baxter et al 2021) and SNOwGLoBES (Scholberg et al 2021) to estimate the interaction rate of our model for two currently operating detectors, a Super-K-like, 32 kT water Cherenkov detector (Fukuda et al 2003) and an IceCube-like, longstring water Cherenkov detector (Abbasi et al 2011). We also include three future detectors: a JUNO-like, 20 kT liquid scintillator detector (An et al 2016); a Hyper-K-like, 220 kT water Cherenkov detector (Abe et al 2018); and a DUNE-like, 40 kT liquid argon detector (Abi et al 2020(Abi et al , 2021.…”
Section: Detection Estimates For Neutrino Echos From Failed Ccsnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we extract from the Monte Carlo data, in 0.1 ms time bins, the luminosity, average energy, and root mean squared energy for each neutrino species in a 30 ms time window around black hole formation, starting ∼7 ms before and continuing ∼23 ms after black hole formation. With these quantities, we use SNEWPY (Baxter et al 2021) and SNOwGLoBES (Scholberg et al 2021) to estimate the interaction rate of our model for two currently operating detectors, a Super-K-like, 32 kT water Cherenkov detector (Fukuda et al 2003) and an IceCube-like, longstring water Cherenkov detector (Abbasi et al 2011). We also include three future detectors: a JUNO-like, 20 kT liquid scintillator detector (An et al 2016); a Hyper-K-like, 220 kT water Cherenkov detector (Abe et al 2018); and a DUNE-like, 40 kT liquid argon detector (Abi et al 2020(Abi et al , 2021.…”
Section: Detection Estimates For Neutrino Echos From Failed Ccsnementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be mentioned that neutrino detections through neutral current reactions have sensitivity to all flavor of neutrinos, although they are subdominant channels in detectors considered in this paper. On the other hand, there are many currently operating or future planed neutrino detectors that utilize nuclear neutral-current interactions (such as coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering) (Chakraborty et al 2014;Aalbers et al 2016;Lang et al 2016;Bandyopadhyay et al 2017;Abe et al 2017;Bhattacharjee et al 2020;Pattavina et al 2020;DarkSide-20k Collaboration et al 2021;Pattavina et al 2021;Akimov et al 2021;Baxter et al 2021). If TONE can be estimated from these detectors, our fitting formula (Eqs.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%