1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00142838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snapshots ?sub specie aeternitatis?: Sinunel, Goffman and formal sociology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Always the teacher, Hughes (1969b:426) suggested that while Goffman may never take up the study of such institutions, “others should try it.” Hughes did not realize, or, perhaps, care to admit, that Goffman's focus on the “neglected situation” (Goffman [1964] 1968) deliberately departed from Hughes's institutional frame of analysis (see Helmes‐Hayes 1998). In this respect, and as Greg Smith (1989, [1989] 1994) has shown, Goffman, not Hughes, faithfully followed Simmel's microsociological method.…”
Section: Phase Two: Concealing the Apprenticeshipmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Always the teacher, Hughes (1969b:426) suggested that while Goffman may never take up the study of such institutions, “others should try it.” Hughes did not realize, or, perhaps, care to admit, that Goffman's focus on the “neglected situation” (Goffman [1964] 1968) deliberately departed from Hughes's institutional frame of analysis (see Helmes‐Hayes 1998). In this respect, and as Greg Smith (1989, [1989] 1994) has shown, Goffman, not Hughes, faithfully followed Simmel's microsociological method.…”
Section: Phase Two: Concealing the Apprenticeshipmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Consistent with the social behaviorism and sociological formalism (Smith, 1994) that informs Goffman's approach to the sociology of the interaction order, central attention was accorded forms of interaction (face-work, performances, role-distance, etc.) rather than a primordial self-other relation.…”
Section: The Other In the Interaction Ordermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If Smith's (2000Smith's ( [1989) discussion was mainly driven by an attempt to explore the similarities and echoes between the sociologies of Simmel and Goffman, Murray S. Davis (1997) offered a portrayal of their relationship designed to highlight the different paths taken by the two. Davis maintains that the work of both Simmel and Goffman served to legitimate the study of human experience and thus to give human beings "more ontological weight" (1997:386; Davis's italics).…”
Section: Simmel and Goffmanmentioning
confidence: 99%