2015
DOI: 10.1107/s1399004715000978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snapshots of ligand entry, malleable binding and induced helical movement in P-glycoprotein

Abstract: Co-crystal structures of P-glycoprotein with a series of engineered ligands reveal multiple ligand-binding modes, a ligand-binding site on the outer surface of the transporter and a conformational change that may couple to ATP hydrolysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
188
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
16
188
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger structural differences are found in several loop regions in both NBDs, in the C-terminal helix of TmrB, increasing linearly toward the terminus, and in the periplasmic loop; these are all regions that would be expected to be less defined in the lower-resolution model and could not be modeled accurately in the cryo-EM map. Furthermore, parts of TM6 of TmrA, as well as in TM2, TM4, and TM5 of TmrB, also showed some variability with regard to the crystal structure; however, TM4 or its equivalent has been observed to be highly variable in several X-ray structures of ABC transporters (17)(18)(19). It is unclear whether the described differences between the cryo-EM model and the X-ray structure are due to a minor conformational change, caused by different experimental environments (cryo-EM vs. crystallography), or due to the limited resolution of the cryo-EM data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger structural differences are found in several loop regions in both NBDs, in the C-terminal helix of TmrB, increasing linearly toward the terminus, and in the periplasmic loop; these are all regions that would be expected to be less defined in the lower-resolution model and could not be modeled accurately in the cryo-EM map. Furthermore, parts of TM6 of TmrA, as well as in TM2, TM4, and TM5 of TmrB, also showed some variability with regard to the crystal structure; however, TM4 or its equivalent has been observed to be highly variable in several X-ray structures of ABC transporters (17)(18)(19). It is unclear whether the described differences between the cryo-EM model and the X-ray structure are due to a minor conformational change, caused by different experimental environments (cryo-EM vs. crystallography), or due to the limited resolution of the cryo-EM data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mouse ABCB1a crystal structure (PDB ID: 4Q9I) [12] was used to construct a human ABCB1 homology model. Maestro Elements was used to prepare the ligands.…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electron density in the low resolution electron cryo-microscopy single particle reconstruction envelope of TmrAB was assigned to the detergent micelle (9). In the low resolution crystal structure of the eukaryotic P-glycoprotein, no lipids were observed (10,11), but non-denaturing mass spectrometry identified tightly associated lipids and a clear dependence of ligand and lipid binding (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%