2019
DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNAP Benefits and Crime: Evidence from Changing Disbursement Schedules

Abstract: In this paper, we study the effects of the timing of nutritional aid disbursement on crime, using two main sources of variation: (a) a policy change in Illinois that substantially increased the number of SNAP distribution days and (b) an existing Indiana policy that issues SNAP benefits by last name. We find that staggering SNAP benefits leads to large reductions in crime and theft at grocery stores by 17.5% and 20.9%, respectively. Findings also show that theft decreases in the second and third weeks followin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
39
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, gaining insurance reduces expected medical expenditures and increases disposable income for the newly insured. Intuition and empirical evidence suggest positive income shocks align with a reduction in financially motivated crimes (Carr & Packham, 2019a). However, income shocks can also affect violent crimes through changes in financially‐related stress.…”
Section: Background and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory, gaining insurance reduces expected medical expenditures and increases disposable income for the newly insured. Intuition and empirical evidence suggest positive income shocks align with a reduction in financially motivated crimes (Carr & Packham, 2019a). However, income shocks can also affect violent crimes through changes in financially‐related stress.…”
Section: Background and Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 To facilitate the transition to the new welfare system, the initial eligibility criteria for claiming UC benefits focused on the simplest cases: New claimants, single, unemployed, non-home-owning and without children. 8 (Kennedy and Keen, 2018). This has led to a large increase in the number of UC recipients in each constituency.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is further supported by estimates that are robust to the inclusion of constituency-specific linear and quadratic trends, and by the event study analysis showing that the increase in burglaries is emerging 'on impact' and it is not inflated by upward crime trajectories prior to the program implementation. 8 New claimants are defined as claimants who were not enrolled in the Legacy system when UC was operating in a constituency. It is possible these claimants were receiving benefits before the introduction of Universal Credit but that-for any reason-left the welfare system some time prior its start.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, government programs have also been found unable to decrease crime, or, less often, to increase it(Jacob et al, 2015;Carr and Koppa, 2017;Costopoulos et al, 2017;Luallen et al, 2018).2 Vogler's work and ours were performed independently and concurrently. His draft was first publicly posted on SSRN when the first draft of this paper was being finalized.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%