1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02472220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snap-back softening instability in high-strength concrete beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, CMOD has been proposed and used as control parameter for stable fracture testing of high-strength concrete 14 and tetragonal zirconia stabilised with 3 mol% of Y 2 O 3 18-20 specimens under conditions that would have led to unstable fracture for displacement controlled tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, CMOD has been proposed and used as control parameter for stable fracture testing of high-strength concrete 14 and tetragonal zirconia stabilised with 3 mol% of Y 2 O 3 18-20 specimens under conditions that would have led to unstable fracture for displacement controlled tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to displacement and load, parameters related to crack growth increase during the whole fracture test, thus, they are suitable to reach stable fracture. In particular, the crack mouth opening displacement (CMOD) has been proposed and used as control parameter for stable fracture testing of high-strength concrete 19 and tetragonal zirconia stabilised with 3 mol% of Y 2 O 3 20-22 specimens under conditions that would have led to unstable fracture for displacement controlled tests; both materials present R-curve behaviour. In our laboratory a special set up for the routine stable fracture testing of brittle ceramics using CMOD as control parameter has been developed; stable fracture of materials such as fine grained magnesium-aluminium spinel and alumina has been attained.…”
Section: Stability Analysis For Fracture Of Senb In Three Points Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, the specimen behaviour is brittle (snap-back) for low SE numbers, i.e., for low fracture toughness, GF, high tensile strengths, u, and/or large sizes, h. In particular, in the case of uncracked beam, for SE 10.45x10 -5 , the P-δ curve presents positive slope in the C T softening branch and a catastrophical event occurs if the loading process is deflection-controlled. Such indenting branch is not virtual only if the loading process is controlled by a monotonically increasing function of time (Biolzi et al [21]). In the case of the cracked beam, on the contrary, the initial crack makes the specimen behaviour more ductile; for the set of S E numbers considered in Fig.…”
Section: The Nonlinear Cohesive Crack Model: Snap-back Instability Asmentioning
confidence: 99%