Exotic Animal Laboratory Diagnosis 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781119108610.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 115 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Bloodwork abnormalities for the snake of the present report included mildly low heterophil count, which was most likely a normal variation; moderately high CK activity, which was most likely due to muscle damage from handling and IM injections; and mildly high aspartate aminotransferase activity, which was more likely secondary to muscle damage as denoted by high CK activity, although hepatocellular lipid accumulation may have also contributed. 11 The snake of the present report had 2 granulomas found on necropsy: 1 near the esophagus and 1 in the small intestine. There was no definitive diagnosis for these granulomas; however, differential diagnoses included perforation or ulceration of the esophagus from multiple tube feedings, parasite migration (considered unlikely because there was no evidence of parasites on necropsy nor histology), or chronic bacterial infection.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…2 Bloodwork abnormalities for the snake of the present report included mildly low heterophil count, which was most likely a normal variation; moderately high CK activity, which was most likely due to muscle damage from handling and IM injections; and mildly high aspartate aminotransferase activity, which was more likely secondary to muscle damage as denoted by high CK activity, although hepatocellular lipid accumulation may have also contributed. 11 The snake of the present report had 2 granulomas found on necropsy: 1 near the esophagus and 1 in the small intestine. There was no definitive diagnosis for these granulomas; however, differential diagnoses included perforation or ulceration of the esophagus from multiple tube feedings, parasite migration (considered unlikely because there was no evidence of parasites on necropsy nor histology), or chronic bacterial infection.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 49%