1980
DOI: 10.2307/3808305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snag Characteristics and Dynamics in Douglas-Fir Forests, Western Oregon

Abstract: We studied snags in 30 stands, 5-445 years old, of unmanaged and managed Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in western Oregon to gain information about snag populations and status after logging. As snag production rates (snags/ha/year) declined from about 100 to 1, mean snag density decreased from 190 to 18/ha in age-classes 35 and 200+, respectively; remnant snags (formed in previous stands) represented 5-14% of current densities. Meanwhile, average snag dbh increased from 13 to 72 cm, and as dbh increased, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
192
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(20 reference statements)
9
192
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Roost trees used in summer were closer to water and on gentler slopes than roost trees used in autumn (Table 2). a DBHR = diameter (cm) at breast height of roost or random tree; DECAYR = decay class of roost or random tree (Cline et al 1980; 1 = live, 2 = declining, 3 = recent dead, 4 = loose bark, 5 = no bark, 6 = broken top, 7 = broken bole); HEIGHT = roost or random tree height (m); BARK = estimation of percent bark remaining on roost or random tree; SLOPE = percent slope; BASAL = stand basal area (m 2 /ha); ELEV = elevation of roost or random tree; WATER = distance of roost tree to closest permanent water source; GAP = percent canopy gap over roost or random tree; DBHN = average diameter (cm) at breast height of four trees nearest to roost or random tree; DECAYN = average decay class of four trees nearest to roost or random tree. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roost trees used in summer were closer to water and on gentler slopes than roost trees used in autumn (Table 2). a DBHR = diameter (cm) at breast height of roost or random tree; DECAYR = decay class of roost or random tree (Cline et al 1980; 1 = live, 2 = declining, 3 = recent dead, 4 = loose bark, 5 = no bark, 6 = broken top, 7 = broken bole); HEIGHT = roost or random tree height (m); BARK = estimation of percent bark remaining on roost or random tree; SLOPE = percent slope; BASAL = stand basal area (m 2 /ha); ELEV = elevation of roost or random tree; WATER = distance of roost tree to closest permanent water source; GAP = percent canopy gap over roost or random tree; DBHN = average diameter (cm) at breast height of four trees nearest to roost or random tree; DECAYN = average decay class of four trees nearest to roost or random tree. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were taken within a few weeks of bats roosting in a tree. For each roost tree, we determined tree species, dbh (cm) using a diameter tape, decay class (Cline et al 1980; i.e., 1 = live, 2 = declining, 3 = recent dead, 4 = loose bark, 5 = no bark, 6 = broken top, 7 = broken bole), crown class (Nyland 1996; i.e., 1 = suppressed, 2 = intermediate, 3 = codominant, 4 = dominant), tree height (m) with a hypsometer, roost height when known, and visually estimated percent bark remaining on the tree. For each of four trees nearest to the roost tree, we determined tree species, dbh (cm), distance (m) to the roost tree, decay class, and crown class.…”
Section: Habitat Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and giant (>121.9 cm). We assigned each snag a decay class from 1 to 5, with class 1 being recently dead and class 5 being almost completely decayed (Cline et al 1980). We assumed that class 1 snags found in 1992 were casualties of the Warner Creek Fire, which allowed us to reconstruct the prefire tree and snag structure of each plot.…”
Section: Fire Severities and Study Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 20-m transect was placed in each cardinal direction from the centre of each plot and each piece of fallen dead wood (>7.6 cm) intersected by the plane of the transect tape was measured: species, diameter, decay class (1-5 where 1-3 = sound and 4-5 = rotten) (Cline et al 1980). To quantify standing dead biomass, 1-m belt transects were used on either side of the planar transect with species, diameter and decay class of all standing dead trees recorded.…”
Section: Fuel Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%