2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa960b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SN 1986J VLBI. IV. The Nature of the Central Component

Abstract: We report on VLA measurements between 1 and 45 GHz of the evolving radio spectral energy distribution (SED) of SN 1986J, made in conjunction with VLBI imaging. The SED of SN 1986J is unique among supernovae, and shows an inversion point and a high-frequency turnover. Both are due to the central component seen in the VLBI images, and both are progressing downward in frequency with time. The optically-thin spectral index of the central component is almost the same as that of the shell. We fit a simple model to t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We describe our observations briefly here. More detail can be found in our series of papers [4,5,6,7]. We have observed SN 1986J with the Jansky Very Large Array (VLA), to measure the evolving total flux density at a wide range of frequencies.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We describe our observations briefly here. More detail can be found in our series of papers [4,5,6,7]. We have observed SN 1986J with the Jansky Very Large Array (VLA), to measure the evolving total flux density at a wide range of frequencies.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details of the fitted values, and other results, please see [7,12]. Of interest in our context of FRB signals propagating through the ejecta is the solution for EM: EM = (1.64 ± 0.21) × 10 9 (t/ 20 yr) −2.72±0.26 cm −6 pc.…”
Section: Evolution Of the Spectral Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several models have been proposed such as neutron star mergers (Totani, 2013;Wang et al, 2016) possibly associated to short Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) (Zhang, 2014;Palaniswamy et al, 2014;Murase et al, 2017) or supramassive neutron star collapses (Falcke & Rezzolla, 2014;Ravi & Lasky, 2014;Li et al, 2014). Non-destructive flaring models including giant pulses from young and rapidly rotating neutron stars (Pen & Connor, 2015;Cordes & Wasserman, 2016), magnetar giant flares (Popov & Postnov, 2013;Lyubarsky, 2014), hyperflares from soft gamma-repeaters (Popov & Postnov, 2010), a young neutron star embeded in a wind bubble (Murase et al, 2016) or maybe from the interior of young supernovae (Bietenholz & Bartel, 2017) are however good astrophysical candidates to explain both types of repeating and non repeating FRBs. More exotic models have also been proposed such as radio burst radiation of superconducting cosmic strings (Cao & Yu, 2018;Ye et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%