1993
DOI: 10.1086/173223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SN 1978K: an Extraordinary Supernova in the Nearby Galaxy NGC 1313

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
108
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It would imply that the brightness of SN 1978K was of the 8th magnitude. This is in contrast to the suggestion by Ryder et al (1993) that SN 1978K was subluminous. Although a very large luminosity of SN 1978K is not completely excluded given the sparse observations in 1978, we conclude that IS dust echo is also unlikely.…”
Section: Light Echocontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would imply that the brightness of SN 1978K was of the 8th magnitude. This is in contrast to the suggestion by Ryder et al (1993) that SN 1978K was subluminous. Although a very large luminosity of SN 1978K is not completely excluded given the sparse observations in 1978, we conclude that IS dust echo is also unlikely.…”
Section: Light Echocontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…SN 1978K is an extraordinarily strong Type IIn SN, which is visible both in radio and X-ray even at ∼30 yr after the explosion (Ryder et al 1993;Petre et al 1994;Chugai et al 1995;Schlegel et al 1996Schlegel et al , 1999Schlegel et al , 2000Schlegel et al , 2004Montes et al 1997;Chu et al 1999;Lenz & Schlegel 2007;Smith et al 2007). Such long-lasting radio and X-ray emissions are clear evidence for the presence of the dense CSM, with which the SN ejecta has been interacting (Chevalier 1982;Chevalier & Fransson 1994;Chugai et al 1995).…”
Section: Spectral Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chandra position of SN 1978K is α = 03h 17m 38.69s, δ = -66 0 33 03.6 (J2000), within 0.46 from the accurate (0.1 ) radio position of [19]. This is consistent with the expected Chandra aspect accuracy.…”
Section: X-ray Astrometrysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since many of these objects are dominated by line emission and the line strengths critically depend on density and composition of both the supernova ejecta and the circumstellar medium (CSM), filter light curves can vary significantly from object to object. A few classical cases are known so far: SN1978K [96], SN1986J [61,95], SN1988Z [114] and SN1995N [41].…”
Section: Core Collapse Supernovaementioning
confidence: 99%