2018
DOI: 10.1364/oe.26.032463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SMS2D designs as starting points for lens optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the several algorithms that have been proposed to automatically generate starting design points of customized optical systems [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], only few computational methods have been demonstrated in the design of OTS optical systems. For example, the substitution method described in [7] is supported by commercially available optical design software with their integrated lens matching algorithms [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the several algorithms that have been proposed to automatically generate starting design points of customized optical systems [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], only few computational methods have been demonstrated in the design of OTS optical systems. For example, the substitution method described in [7] is supported by commercially available optical design software with their integrated lens matching algorithms [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SMS provides a starting point for imaging quality optimization. (10) Hu et al employed the edge-ray principle to design an ultracompact rotational symmetric lens with double freeform surfaces that redistribute the light from a Lambertian LED and increase illumination uniformity in the target area. (11) A genetic algorithm was used to optimize the design for optical compactness under structural constraints and illumination requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We broadly classify imaging construction methods by how they ensure the consistency of the freeform surfaces. First, simultaneous multiple surfaces (SMS) based methods [4,5,6] use a small bundle of construction rays which are cleverly coupled to design consistent surfaces. Secondly, point-by-point methods [7,8] use a dense batch of feature rays and fitting methods to recalculate iteratively surfaces normals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two differentiations are necessary to take into account all the constraints set in Eq. (6). We thus obtain a system of 48 equations with 37 unknowns according to Table 1, column 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%